2018
DOI: 10.1108/vjikms-07-2016-0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauging the impact of knowledge management practices on organizational performance – a balanced scorecard perspective

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to explore knowledge management (KM) literature to understand the relationships among different KM practices and organizational performance (OP) in terms of the four balanced scorecard (BSC) outcomes, i.e. learning and growth, internal process, customer satisfaction and financial performance, as a measure of OP. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles has been carried out of theoretical and empirical articles to understand the linkages between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(108 reference statements)
1
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies related to KM constructs are not sufficient in the Indian context. A recent study by Gupta and Chopra (2018) also pointed to the dearth of KM literature in the Indian sub-continent. A review of the literature indicates that empirical studies conducted in India are mostly surveys of the level of KM implementation in Indian business environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies related to KM constructs are not sufficient in the Indian context. A recent study by Gupta and Chopra (2018) also pointed to the dearth of KM literature in the Indian sub-continent. A review of the literature indicates that empirical studies conducted in India are mostly surveys of the level of KM implementation in Indian business environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A GC traz vantagens para as organizações, pois tem forte efeito no desempenho (Gupta & Chopra, 2019) e auxilia no aumento da produtividade e eficiência (Navimipour & Charband, 2016), o que auxilia a organização a alcançar melhores resultados, pois o conhecimento pode ser considerado o ativo mais valioso de uma organização (Wiig, 1993).…”
Section: Fundamentação Teóricaunclassified
“…Culture refers to the values and norms existing in an organization, which have been developed, shared and passed on from one to another (Davenport and Klahr, 1998). Research has proven time and again that creating a knowledge-friendly culture is imperative for smooth flow of information essential for knowledge-based value creation (Moffett et al, 2003;Lee and Choi, 2003;Wong and Aspinwall, 2005;Hung et al, 2005;Al-Busaidi and Olfman,2005;Akhavan and Jafari, 2006;Choy Chong, 2006;du Plessis, 2007;Tunc Bozbura, 2007;Basu and Kumar Ray, 2014;Palacios Marqués and José Garrig os Sim on, 2006;Zaim et al, 2007;Valmohammadi and Ahmadi, 2015;Appelbaum et al, 2014;Vanhala and Ritala, 2016;Lee et al, 2016;Gupta and Chopra, 2017). Development of an environment of mutual trust and collaboration positively affects inter-personal interaction, facilitates knowledge sharing, leading to better yielding knowledge processes and organizational effort.…”
Section: The Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most KM benefits are intangible in nature, balanced scorecard outcomes (BSC) is one method of measurement (Lee et al, 2005) that may be employed to gauge the overall effect. Gupta and Chopra (2017) have proposed and developed a conceptual framework for integrating BSC in the measurement of KM performance. BSC is a strong and comprehensive metric program that can help an organization quantify the amount of effort and returns generated by different units of a business.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%