2009
DOI: 10.1002/rob.20309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian process modeling of large‐scale terrain

Abstract: Building a model of large-scale terrain that can adequately handle uncertainty and incompleteness in a statistically sound way is a challenging problem. This work proposes the use of Gaussian processes as models of large-scale terrain. The proposed model naturally provides a multiresolution representation of space, incorporates and handles uncertainties aptly, and copes with incompleteness of sensory information. Gaussian process regression techniques are applied to estimate and interpolate (to fill gaps in oc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A good introduction into GPs can be found in [17]. In robotics, GPs have been used for terrain modeling [20], for occupancy mapping [16], for estimating gas distributions [19], learning motion and observation models [12] and several other problems. In some parts, the approach of Vasudevan et al [20] is similar to our method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A good introduction into GPs can be found in [17]. In robotics, GPs have been used for terrain modeling [20], for occupancy mapping [16], for estimating gas distributions [19], learning motion and observation models [12] and several other problems. In some parts, the approach of Vasudevan et al [20] is similar to our method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In robotics, GPs have been used for terrain modeling [20], for occupancy mapping [16], for estimating gas distributions [19], learning motion and observation models [12] and several other problems. In some parts, the approach of Vasudevan et al [20] is similar to our method. To model large outdoor terrain structures, they perform a nearest neighbor query on measured elevation data and consider only inputs in the local neighborhood of the query point.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, GP models are particularly favoured for their ability to handle incomplete data in a principled probabilistic fashion. Examples of such approaches include [9], [19], [30], although they were first introduced to the geostatistics field under the name kriging many years previously by [11] amongst others. While these approaches differ in their choice of (non-stationary) covariance function and GP sparsification method, they adopt the same parameterisation of the problem -that is they model a function f : R 2 → R which associates a single elevation value z with any given position (x, y) in 3D Euclidean space.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explicitly account for noise in the training observations r through an additive white noise process of strength σ m along the diagonal entries of K 2 . The derivation of the mean E[r * ] and covariance V[r * ] of the predictive distribution p(r * |q * , D) for a deterministic µ(q) = 0 (as is commonly used [30]) are standard and can be found, for example, in [21] …”
Section: Non-functional Surface Representation Via Sensor Configmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mobile robotics, elevation grids have been processed with fuzzy rules to assess traversability [18,19]. Gaussian processes have also been proposed to model terrain from uncertain and incomplete sensor data [20]. Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) [21] has been employed to recognize objects like trees and buildings from aerial stereo images [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%