1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00075-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaze-shift dynamics in two kinds of sequential looking tasks

Abstract: Gaze-shift dynamics of unrestrained seated subjects were examined. The subjects participated in two tasks. In the first task, they tapped sequences of 3-D targets located on a table in front of them. In the second task, they only looked at similar sequences of targets. The purpose of the task (tapping vs only looking) affected the dynamics of gaze-shifts. Gaze and eye-in-head peak velocities were higher and gaze-shift durations were shorter during tapping than during looking-only. We conclude that task variabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
75
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
13
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Saccades to acoustic (Zambarbieri et al 1982) and tactile targets (Groh and Sparks 1996) are slower. The main sequence also depends on the subject's visual task such as just looking at visual targets or actually tapping the targets (Epelboim et al 1997) or pointing to real or remembered targets (Smit et al 1987). However, all these main sequences have a similar shape and the task may determine the relative weighting of movement and fixation cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saccades to acoustic (Zambarbieri et al 1982) and tactile targets (Groh and Sparks 1996) are slower. The main sequence also depends on the subject's visual task such as just looking at visual targets or actually tapping the targets (Epelboim et al 1997) or pointing to real or remembered targets (Smit et al 1987). However, all these main sequences have a similar shape and the task may determine the relative weighting of movement and fixation cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steinman et al (1990) showed that applying a bite-board reduces the peak velocity of eye movements to a much larger extent than could be explained by the contribution of the head movement. Epelboim et al (1997) showed that when subjects moved their hand to the target of a saccade, the peak velocity of the saccades was increased systematically. No mention of variability was made in these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling is bidirectional in that the oculomotor system is also influenced when pointing responses are made with the hand. (Epelboim et al 1997;Lunenburger et al 2000;Snyder 2002; van Donkelaar and Lee, 1994;van Donkelaar et al 1992van Donkelaar et al , 1997van Donkelaar et al , 2000van Donkelaar et al , 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%