2016
DOI: 10.1002/nla.2034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GCV for Tikhonov regularization via global Golub–Kahan decomposition

Abstract: Generalized Cross Validation (GCV) is a popular approach to determining the regularization parameter in Tikhonov regularization. The regularization parameter is chosen by minimizing an expression, which is easy to evaluate for small-scale problems, but prohibitively expensive to compute for large-scale ones. This paper describes a novel method, based on Gauss-type quadrature, for determining upper and lower bounds for the desired expression. These bounds are used to determine the regularization parameter for l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both methods bring along some downsides, such as, just to name a few, the existence of a corner in the L-curve and the feasibility of the computations in the GCV, especially when dealing with large-scale problems; see [7] for a more extensive discussion and non-quadratic regularizers. A plethora of literature has been focused on developing strategies to overcome the downsides of these classical methods [2,8,12,17,18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods bring along some downsides, such as, just to name a few, the existence of a corner in the L-curve and the feasibility of the computations in the GCV, especially when dealing with large-scale problems; see [7] for a more extensive discussion and non-quadratic regularizers. A plethora of literature has been focused on developing strategies to overcome the downsides of these classical methods [2,8,12,17,18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting x = V ℓ y, y ∈ R ℓ , into (5) and determining an approximate solution by a Galerkin method gives the equation…”
Section: Krylov Subspace Methods For Nonnegative Tikhonov Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will use the discrepancy principle in the computed examples reported in Section 4. However, the solution methods discussed in this paper also can be applied in conjunction with other techniques for determining a suitable value of µ > 0, including the L-curve criterion and generalized cross validation; see [5,4,6,7] for discussions and comparisons of many methods for determining a suitable value of the regularization parameter. Due to the fact that many singular values of the matrix A cluster at the origin, the least-squares problem (1) may be numerically rank-deficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the regularization parameter is important and many methods have been proposed in the literature; see, e.g., [10,13,15,17] and references therein. We will apply the discrepancy principle in the present paper.…”
Section: The Discrepancy Principle and Zero-findersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regularization parameter µ > 0 determines the sensitivity of x µ to the error e in b, and how close x µ is to the desired vector x true . Many methods for determining a suitable value of the regularization parameter, including the discrepancy principle, the L-curve criterion, and generalized cross validation, require repeated solution of (4) for several values of µ; see, e.g., [10,13,15,17]. When the matrices A and L are of small to moderate size, one therefore often first computes the generalized singular value decomposition (GSVD) of the matrix pair {A, L}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%