2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulus-based iterative methods for constrained Tikhonov regularization

Abstract: Tikhonov regularization is one of the most popular methods for the solution of linear discrete ill-posed problems. In many applications the desired solution is known to lie in the nonnegative cone. It is then natural to require that the approximate solution determined by Tikhonov regularization also lies in this cone. The present paper describes two iterative methods, that employ modulus-based iterative methods, to compute approximate solutions in the nonnegative cone of large-scale Tikhonov regularization pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof Let α and γ be positive constants shown in Algorithm 1. Because the matrix A defined in is symmetric positive definite, we know from Corollary 2 in the work of Bai et al that LCP ( q , A ), with q defined in , has a unique solution z ∗ . Theorem shows that x=γ2false(z1αfalse(Az+qfalse)false) is the solution of the following implicit fixed‐point equation: Pfalse(αI+Afalse)x=Pfalse(αIAfalse)false|xfalse|γq. For any initial vector x0R2mn×1, the inexact iteration solution x k + 1 ( k = 0,1,2,…) of generated by Algorithm 1 should be the exact solution of the following iteration equation: Pfalse(αI+Afalse)xk+1=Pfalse(αIAfalse)false|xkfalse|γq+pk. If we write xk=false[false(xkfalse(1false)false),false(xkfalse(2false)false)false] with xkfalse(1false),xkfalse(2false)Rmn×1, the solution x k + 1 of can be obtained by solving xk+1false(1false) and xk+1false(2false) separately because of the special structure of the coefficient matrix P ( α I + A ) shown in …”
Section: Modulus Iteration Methods For the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Proof Let α and γ be positive constants shown in Algorithm 1. Because the matrix A defined in is symmetric positive definite, we know from Corollary 2 in the work of Bai et al that LCP ( q , A ), with q defined in , has a unique solution z ∗ . Theorem shows that x=γ2false(z1αfalse(Az+qfalse)false) is the solution of the following implicit fixed‐point equation: Pfalse(αI+Afalse)x=Pfalse(αIAfalse)false|xfalse|γq. For any initial vector x0R2mn×1, the inexact iteration solution x k + 1 ( k = 0,1,2,…) of generated by Algorithm 1 should be the exact solution of the following iteration equation: Pfalse(αI+Afalse)xk+1=Pfalse(αIAfalse)false|xkfalse|γq+pk. If we write xk=false[false(xkfalse(1false)false),false(xkfalse(2false)false)false] with xkfalse(1false),xkfalse(2false)Rmn×1, the solution x k + 1 of can be obtained by solving xk+1false(1false) and xk+1false(2false) separately because of the special structure of the coefficient matrix P ( α I + A ) shown in …”
Section: Modulus Iteration Methods For the Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCP can be formulated as Az+q0,0.1emz0,0.1emzfalse(Az+qfalse)=0, where ARn×n and qRn are the given matrix and vector, zRn is the unknown variable of the LCP ( q , A ), the notation “≥” denotes the componentwise defined partial ordering between two vectors, and the superscript (·) ⊤ denotes the transpose of the corresponding vector or matrix. The LCP has a unique solution if A is symmetric positive definite . Many methods such as efficient splitting iteration methods and modulus‐based iteration methods have been proposed in the literature to obtain the numerical solutions of .…”
Section: Linear Complementarity Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations