2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-015-9435-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gd2O3:Eu3+/PPO/POPOP/PS composites for digital imaging radiation detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1a shows that the optical transmittance of the samples as a function of wavelength decrease with increasing scintillator filler content, as increasing filler concentration leads to light dispersion and decreased optical transparency of the films. The main emission peak of the Gd2O3:Eu 3+ is observed at ≈ 611 nm and is related to the red emission transition of Eu 3+ under X-ray radiation [15,22]. Figure 2b shows the optical transmittance as a function of Gd2O3:Eu 3+ content, at a wavelength of 611nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 1a shows that the optical transmittance of the samples as a function of wavelength decrease with increasing scintillator filler content, as increasing filler concentration leads to light dispersion and decreased optical transparency of the films. The main emission peak of the Gd2O3:Eu 3+ is observed at ≈ 611 nm and is related to the red emission transition of Eu 3+ under X-ray radiation [15,22]. Figure 2b shows the optical transmittance as a function of Gd2O3:Eu 3+ content, at a wavelength of 611nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2b shows the optical transmittance as a function of Gd2O3:Eu 3+ content, at a wavelength of 611nm. The transmittance at ≈ 611 nm suffers a decrease with increasing of scintillator nanoparticle content due to increased light dispersion [22] which leads to the decrease of the composites transmittance from 85% for the pristine polymer to around 65% for the higher filler concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of the printed photodetector under X-ray radiation with and without the printed scintillator layer was measured by subjecting the samples to the X-ray radiation produced by a Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer using Cu Kα incident radiation (wavelength of 1.54056 angstroms) and powered with a voltage of 40 kV and a current ranging from 0 to 40 mA (output power changes from 0 to 1600 W). The efficiency of the X-ray to visible conversion was evaluated with an electronic measurement system that allows to quantify the emitted visible wavelength radiation, as described in 35 .…”
Section: Characterization Of the Printed Photodetectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%