2013
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2013070102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and E-Government Adoption in Spain

Abstract: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) models, which include trust as a central factor, are currently standard tools for studying the process of new technology acceptance, but some further research is needed to gauge how different variables could influence this process. This is the case of gender factor, given that there is no general accord in the literature as to the role of this variable. Thus, the present research focuses on hypothetical gender-based differences that could aff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Information quality Abu-Shanab & Al-Azzam, 2012;Carter & Belanger, 2004;Carter & Weerakkkody, 2008;Emrah Kanat & Özkan, 2009;Hussein et al, 2011;Kumar et al, 2018;Kurfali et al, 2017;Lallmahomed et al, 2017;Li, 2021;Mansoori et al, 2018;Mensah & Adams, 2020;Ozkan & Kanat, 2011;Pappas et al, 2018;Rehman et al, 2012;Srivastava & Teo, 2009;Verkijika & De Wet, 2018;Wang & Lo, 2012;Zhang & Zhu, 2020;  Internal political self-efficacy (Hussein et al, 2011)  External political self-efficacy (Hussein et al, 2011) • Trust in intermediary (Al-Sobhi et al, 2012;Kumar et al, 2018;Weerakkkody et al, 2013) • Trust in e-Government services Karavasilis et al, 2016;Pappas et al, 2018; • Trust in e-Government organization • Trust in channels that provide e-government services • Trust (with no further conceptualization) (Abdel-Fattah, 2015;Alryalat et al, 2012;Carter & Weerakkkody, 2008;Emrah Kanat & Özkan, 2009;Moreno et al, 2013;Samuel et al, 2020;Deden Witarsyah et al, 2017; • Trust in technology/Internet (Al-Sobhi et al, 2012; • Trust in Internet technology (Srivastava & Teo, 2009) • Trust in technology (Gupta et al, 2017)  Trust in data storage and management  Trust in technical infrastructure • Trust of the system Schaupp et al, 2009) • Trustworthi...…”
Section: Appendix a Literature Review Process And Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Information quality Abu-Shanab & Al-Azzam, 2012;Carter & Belanger, 2004;Carter & Weerakkkody, 2008;Emrah Kanat & Özkan, 2009;Hussein et al, 2011;Kumar et al, 2018;Kurfali et al, 2017;Lallmahomed et al, 2017;Li, 2021;Mansoori et al, 2018;Mensah & Adams, 2020;Ozkan & Kanat, 2011;Pappas et al, 2018;Rehman et al, 2012;Srivastava & Teo, 2009;Verkijika & De Wet, 2018;Wang & Lo, 2012;Zhang & Zhu, 2020;  Internal political self-efficacy (Hussein et al, 2011)  External political self-efficacy (Hussein et al, 2011) • Trust in intermediary (Al-Sobhi et al, 2012;Kumar et al, 2018;Weerakkkody et al, 2013) • Trust in e-Government services Karavasilis et al, 2016;Pappas et al, 2018; • Trust in e-Government organization • Trust in channels that provide e-government services • Trust (with no further conceptualization) (Abdel-Fattah, 2015;Alryalat et al, 2012;Carter & Weerakkkody, 2008;Emrah Kanat & Özkan, 2009;Moreno et al, 2013;Samuel et al, 2020;Deden Witarsyah et al, 2017; • Trust in technology/Internet (Al-Sobhi et al, 2012; • Trust in Internet technology (Srivastava & Teo, 2009) • Trust in technology (Gupta et al, 2017)  Trust in data storage and management  Trust in technical infrastructure • Trust of the system Schaupp et al, 2009) • Trustworthi...…”
Section: Appendix a Literature Review Process And Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a general understanding that e-government projects have been limited in dealing with the gender digital divide, especially in developing and rural areas (Al-Rababah & Abu-Shanab, 2010;Okunola et al, 2017). Countries that have rapidly adopted ICT can approach closing the divide (Choi & Park, 2013;Moreno et al, 2013) but even cities that adopt digital government are at risk of perpetuating inequalities if gender is not considered in how systems are designed (Nesti, 2019). Knowledge on the extent of the divide is also especially scarce for low-income countries (Brännström, 2012).…”
Section: Digital Government and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process designs of these initiatives must ensure that the citizens are at ease to make use of these applications. This can result in improvement of trust and promotion of transparency in services, making it more efficient in service relationships (Moreno et al , 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%