Gender and Racial Discrimination in Hiring Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a Field Experiment of Accountants, 2018–2020

Abstract

In this article, we ask whether macro-level changes during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic relate to changes in the levels of discrimination against women and Black job-seekers at the point of hire. We develop three main hypotheses: that discrimination against women and Black job-seekers increases due to a reduction in labor demand; that discrimination against women decreases due to the reduced supply of women employees and applicants; and that discrimination against Black job-seekers decreases due to increased attention toward racial inequities associated with the Black Lives Matter protests during the summer of 2020. We test these hypotheses using a correspondence audit study collected over two periods, before and during the early COVID-19 pandemic, for one professional occupation: accountants. We find that White women experience a positive change in callbacks during the pandemic, being preferred over White men, and this change is concentrated in geographic areas that experienced relatively larger decreases in women's labor supply. Black women experience discrimination pre-pandemic but receive similar callbacks to White men during the pandemic. In contrast to both White and Black women, discrimination against Black men is persistent before and during the pandemic. Our findings are consistent with the prediction of gender-specific changes in labor supply being associated with gender-specific changes in hiring discrimination during the COVID-19 pandemic. More broadly, our study shows how hiring decision-making is related to macro-level labor market processes.

Potential bias when using social media for selection: Differential effects of candidate demographic characteristics, race match, perceived similarity, and profile detail

“…These results align with the subordinate male target hypothesis (Sidanius & Veniegas, 2000) and other studies that found that Black women were preferred over Black men (Hosoda, Stone, et al, 2003). This pattern is also supported by a recent study examining gender and racial discrimination before and after the pandemic (Chavez et al, 2022), which found that hiring outcomes for White and Black women equaled or exceeded those for White men, but Black men still struggled. This result highlights the importance of examining intersectionality as it may camouflage significant effects across demographic groups (Krings et al, 2022).…”

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Black and Hispanic Americans’ Work Outcomes: a Scoping Review

“…From the 44 articles examined, the literature highlights essential workers generally (19) and in specific industries: healthcare (8), agriculture (meat and farm workers) (5), service workers (1) [ 45 ], accounting (1) [ 49 ], and higher education (1) [ 70 ]. Most articles included multiple races (24), examining the work outcomes of White, Black, Hispanic, and sometimes, Indigenous and Asian adults.…”

The (In)Flexibility of Racial Discrimination: Labor Market Context and the Racial Wage Gap in the United States, 2000 to 2021

“…The different findings for black workers for the samples excluding and including the post-COVID-19 months may be associated with compositional changes in the labor force that affected black workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent research has shown that black workers were at a higher risk for being laid off (Dias 2021) and continued to experience discrimination in hiring during the post-COVID-19 recovery period (Chavez, Weisshaar, Cabello-Hutt 2022). For different reasons, the employment status of Hispanic and Asian workers was less affected in the post-COVID-19 period.…”