2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, it would be possible to obtain more precise results in terms of the implicit perceptions of the FBE of all the studied countries. It would also be possible to use the PRISMA method (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), working through the search for specific words (e.g., bioeconomy and forest), similar to the method used by Sanz-Hernández et al [81]. However, this would not sufficiently affect the implicit statements of the FBE in the Czech and Slovak documents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it would be possible to obtain more precise results in terms of the implicit perceptions of the FBE of all the studied countries. It would also be possible to use the PRISMA method (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), working through the search for specific words (e.g., bioeconomy and forest), similar to the method used by Sanz-Hernández et al [81]. However, this would not sufficiently affect the implicit statements of the FBE in the Czech and Slovak documents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This continued into the postreformation period when women's political struggles were based on life experiences and socialization processes (Soedarwo, 2014). Thus, Sanz-Hernández et al, (2022) underscore the existence of economic independence that supports women's political and social struggles.…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of these studies emphasized the importance of women and gender equality in creating added value in the bioeconomy sphere. Furthermore, the need for this analysis clearly emerges from the systematic review of the literature on the connection between gender and bioeconomy developed by Sanz-Hernández et al [ 23 ]. Briefly, the authors concluded in a trenchant manner that “bioeconomy literature is making hardly any contribution to the debates and social currents that link gender, development, and sustainability” where “women are simply named”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%