Gender differences in the structural connectome of the teenage brain revealed by generalized q-sampling MRI

Abstract

The question of whether there are biological differences between male and female brains is a fraught one, and political positions and prior expectations seem to have a strong influence on the interpretation of scientific data in this field. This question is relevant to issues of gender differences in the prevalence of psychiatric conditions, including autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Tourette's syndrome, schizophrenia, dyslexia, depression, and eating disorders. Understanding how gender influences vulnerability to these conditions is significant. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) provides a non-invasive method to investigate brain microstructure and the integrity of anatomical connectivity. Generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI) has been proposed to characterize complicated fiber patterns and distinguish fiber orientations, providing an opportunity for more accurate, higher-order descriptions through the water diffusion process. Therefore, we aimed to investigate differences in the brain's structural network between teenage males and females using GQI. This study included 59 (i.e., 33 males and 26 females) age- and education-matched subjects (age range: 13 to 14 years). The structural connectome was obtained by graph theoretical and network-based statistical (NBS) analyses. Our findings show that teenage male brains exhibit better intrahemispheric communication, and teenage female brains exhibit better interhemispheric communication. Our results also suggest that the network organization of teenage male brains is more local, more segregated, and more similar to small-world networks than teenage female brains. We conclude that the use of an MRI study with a GQI-based structural connectomic approach like ours presents novel insights into network-based systems of the brain and provides a new piece of the puzzle regarding gender differences.

Understanding greater male variability in general intelligence: The role of hemispheric independence and lateralization

“…Although that particular high-profile study has attracted controversy, other researchers have drawn similar conclusions (e.g. Jahanshad et al, 2011;Tunç et al, 2016;Tyan, Liao, Shen, Lin & Weng, 2017). Ritchie et al (2017) report stronger functional connectivity for males in unimodal sensorimotor cortices, and stronger connectivity for females in the default mode network.…”

Age‐related changes in fiber tracts in healthy adult brains: A generalized q‐sampling and connectometry study

“…We did not obtain the education years and cognitive tests, and no real patients were analyzed. Gender and education level were not analyzed, which were potentially associated with WM changes. In addition, the reconstruction parameters may be not optimal; the cohort of study participants was not large and these factors may have biased the results.…”

From STEM to STEAM: How to Monitor Creativity

“…Creativity seems rooted in normative cognitive processes and neuronal representations apparently measurable by neuronal imaging techniques. Several studies have demonstrated a new and promising way to investigate aspects of creative thinking using neuroscientific methods (Thagard & Stewart, 2011;Tyan, Liao, Shen, Lin, & Weng, 2017). Particular brain areas have been identified with creativity.…”

“…Recent evidence has demonstrated neurophysiologically determined gender differences regarding rewarding (Volf & Tarasova, 2013). Tyan et al (2017) reported gender differences in communication between brain areas: Brains of male teenagers seem to involve better intrahemispheric communication, brains of female teenagers for interhemispheric communication. The male network organization is more local, more segregated, and more similar to smallworld networks.…”