Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
OBJECTIVES To evaluate gender-related outcomes during endovascular treatment of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic diseases (TEVAR). METHODS Multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study. All TEVARs between January 2005 and April 2023 were identified. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, and cumulative survival. Secondary outcomes were vascular access complications, and freedom from TEVAR-related reintervention. Interventions performed in male patients were matched to females on the basis of a one-to-one coarsened exact matching. RESULTS We identified 151 males who were matched with 151 females. Mortality at 30-day was not statistically different between females and males (11.2% vs 11.2%, P = 1.0). At binary logistic regression analysis, duration of intervention (P = 0.001), and emergency TEVAR (P = 0.001) were associated with mortality at 30 days. Gender did not impact access vessel complication rate [n = 6 (4.0%) vs n = 5 (3.3%), P = 1.0]. The median of follow-up was 46 (IQR, 7-84) months with no difference between males and females [median, 50 (11-95) vs 37.5 (3.5-71.2); P = 0.153]. Estimated survival was not statistically different between females and males (Log-rank χ2 = 0.6, P = 0.442; 95% CI: 110.7-207.3). At Cox’s regression analysis, gender did not impact overall survival (HR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.3, P = 0.450). Estimated freedom from TEVAR-related reinterventions was not statistically different between females and males (Log-rank χ2 = 0.4, P = 0.837; 95% CI: 187.8-219.3). CONCLUSIONS Female gender itself was not associated with worse 30-day mortality and late survival than males with similar access vessel complication as well as TEVAR-related reintervention rate.
OBJECTIVES To evaluate gender-related outcomes during endovascular treatment of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic diseases (TEVAR). METHODS Multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study. All TEVARs between January 2005 and April 2023 were identified. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, and cumulative survival. Secondary outcomes were vascular access complications, and freedom from TEVAR-related reintervention. Interventions performed in male patients were matched to females on the basis of a one-to-one coarsened exact matching. RESULTS We identified 151 males who were matched with 151 females. Mortality at 30-day was not statistically different between females and males (11.2% vs 11.2%, P = 1.0). At binary logistic regression analysis, duration of intervention (P = 0.001), and emergency TEVAR (P = 0.001) were associated with mortality at 30 days. Gender did not impact access vessel complication rate [n = 6 (4.0%) vs n = 5 (3.3%), P = 1.0]. The median of follow-up was 46 (IQR, 7-84) months with no difference between males and females [median, 50 (11-95) vs 37.5 (3.5-71.2); P = 0.153]. Estimated survival was not statistically different between females and males (Log-rank χ2 = 0.6, P = 0.442; 95% CI: 110.7-207.3). At Cox’s regression analysis, gender did not impact overall survival (HR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.3, P = 0.450). Estimated freedom from TEVAR-related reinterventions was not statistically different between females and males (Log-rank χ2 = 0.4, P = 0.837; 95% CI: 187.8-219.3). CONCLUSIONS Female gender itself was not associated with worse 30-day mortality and late survival than males with similar access vessel complication as well as TEVAR-related reintervention rate.
Objective Analysis of gender-specific differences in short- and long-term outcome after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) regarding the distal anastomosis. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, data from 4853 patients of a German health insurance company undergoing OAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) between 2010 and 2016 were analysed. The patients were followed through 2018. Results A total of 4050 (83.5%) men and 803 (16.6%) women underwent OAR. Women were older than men (72.9 ± 8.7 vs 69.8 ± 8.5 years; P < .001). A tube graft was used in 2644 (54.5%) patients, an aorto-biiliac bifurcated graft in 1657 (34.1%) and an aorto-bifemoral bifurcated graft in 552 (11.4%). Perioperative mortality was not significantly different between men (5.7%) and women (6.5%) in the total patient population ( P = .411). This was true for aorto-aortic tube grafting ( P = .361), aorto-biiliac reconstructions ( P = 1.000) and aorto-bifemoral reconstructions ( P = .345). Kaplan-Meier estimated long-term survival of men after 9 years was better than that of women (55.0% vs 43.8%; P = .006). However, separated by the site of the distal anastomosis, this was only true for aorto-aortic reconstructions (survival men vs women 56.0% vs 42.1%; P = .005), not for aorto-biiliac and aorto-bifemoral reconstructions. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, age over 80 years, heart failure, aorto-bifemoral reconstruction, chronic kidney disease stage 3-5, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral artery disease, arterial hypertension, but not gender ( P = .531), had a negative impact on long-term survival. Conclusion If possible, an aorto-aortic tube graft should be preferred to aorto-biiliac and aorto-bifemoral reconstructions in OAR. Patients selected for aorto-bifemoral artery reconstruction exhibit higher perioperative morbidity and mortality as well as worse long-term survival compared to patients selected for an intra-abdominal reconstruction. In the multivariate regression analysis, gender was not an independent risk factor for either short- or long-term outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.