2020
DOI: 10.1177/0891243220965913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Identity, the Sexed Body, and the Medical Making of Transgender

Abstract: In this article, I argue that the medical conceptualization of gender identity in the United States has entered a “new regime of truth.” Drawing from a mixed-methods analysis of medical journals, I illuminate a shift in the locus of gender identity from external genitalia and pathologization of families to genes and brain structure and individualized self-conception. The sexed body itself has also undergone a transformation: Sex no longer resides solely in genitalia but has traveled to more visible parts of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acts of categorizing refuse recognition of the vast permutations of differences typically lumped together as “sex.” Attributing “typical” patterns of chromosomes, hormones, and appearances of genitals as maleness and femaleness is typification—gender attribution (Crawley, Foley, and Shehan 2008; Friedman 2006; Kessler and McKenna 1978). Basing this typification on the singular criterion of presumptions of reproductive capacity—not actual reproductive practice or capacity or a wide variety of other kinds of identifying criteria—makes the same assumption as homophobic claims to the biological primacy of heteronormativity (Gonsalves 2020)—the very basis of queer criticism.…”
Section: Ethnomethodology Reduxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Acts of categorizing refuse recognition of the vast permutations of differences typically lumped together as “sex.” Attributing “typical” patterns of chromosomes, hormones, and appearances of genitals as maleness and femaleness is typification—gender attribution (Crawley, Foley, and Shehan 2008; Friedman 2006; Kessler and McKenna 1978). Basing this typification on the singular criterion of presumptions of reproductive capacity—not actual reproductive practice or capacity or a wide variety of other kinds of identifying criteria—makes the same assumption as homophobic claims to the biological primacy of heteronormativity (Gonsalves 2020)—the very basis of queer criticism.…”
Section: Ethnomethodology Reduxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bifurcation into two categories of male and female is an invention of science, and its stability is maintained by scientific and legal attribution (Davis 2015; Fausto-Sterling 1992, 2000, 2005; Friedman 2006; Karkazis 2018; Kessler 1998; Roughgarden 2004) as much as routine attribution (similarly, see Somerville’s [2000] queer, anti-racist analysis of the connection of scientific racism and homophobia). Indeed, the science of reproduction, with claims to the “nature” of bodies, has changed significantly over time, with notions of male and female being variously understood (Elson 2004; Gonsalves 2020; Happe 2013; Laqueur 1990; Richardson 2013; Shiebinger 1993). Furthermore, the science of reproduction has invoked racism and homophobia (Gonsalves 2020; Happe 2013; Somerville 2000) as much as being mired in productions of binary gender.…”
Section: Ethnomethodology Reduxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, transgender people may need to be assigned a diagnosis in order to qualify for gender-affirming procedures (or be reimbursed for them, in cases where health insurance covers such procedures) or in order to amend birth certificates and passports or defend legal rights (Spade, 2006;Stryker, 2008). Therefore, transgender people have had to engage strategically with medical categorization (Gonsalves, 2020;Hanssmann, 2017;Johnson, 2019, Psihopaidas, 2016Zuiderent-Jerak and Jerak-Zuiderent, 2016) − often acquiescing to, yet also resenting, a characterization of themselves as having a medical or mental health condition (Ashley, 2019a;Stone, 1991). In ICD-10, this characterization took the specific form of a grouping within the chapter on mental and behavioral disorders called 'gender identity disorders', and within it a category called 'transsexualism': 'a desire to live and be accepted as a member of the opposite sex, usually accompanied by a sense of discomfort with, or inappropriateness of, one's anatomic sex, and a wish to have surgery and hormonal treatment to make one's body as congruent as possible with one's preferred sex'.…”
Section: Collaboration and The Politics Of Transgender Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Westbrook and Schilt (2014) introduce the concept "determining gender" to illustrate the process by which transgender people are placed into sex/gender categories. Analyzing instances of conflict and resolution over "who counts as a man and who counts as a woman," Westbrook and Schilt (2014:32) find that in gender-segregated spaces, such as bathrooms and sports teams, biology-based accounts, such as surgical and hormonal criteria, are premiere in determining gender (see also G. Davis et al 2016;Gonsalves 2020;Lampe et al 2019). They describe how gender-segregated spaces, like bathrooms, are justified through rhetoric they name "penis panics," which situate bodies with penises as a threat and women as potential victims (Schilt and Westbrook 2015).…”
Section: Transgender People and The Sex/ Gender/sexuality Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%