2020
DOI: 10.5514/rmac.v46.i1.76956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender of Authors in the Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis: Changes Over Time

Abstract: e Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis was examined from 1975 to 2018 to determine the proportion of authorship by women and men.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the data depicted in the figure (Panels A–C) were calculated based on the percentage of authorship and editorial listings. That is, each author’s or editor’s appearance was counted as an independent entry (cf., Curiel et al, 2020; González-Álvarez & Cervera-Crespo, 2019; Larivière et al, 2013; Poling et al, 2009). Second, the data are based on a binary categorization (woman or man).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the data depicted in the figure (Panels A–C) were calculated based on the percentage of authorship and editorial listings. That is, each author’s or editor’s appearance was counted as an independent entry (cf., Curiel et al, 2020; González-Álvarez & Cervera-Crespo, 2019; Larivière et al, 2013; Poling et al, 2009). Second, the data are based on a binary categorization (woman or man).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categorization was based on each author’s first and last name and information obtained from various online platforms (e.g., university profiles, company profiles, LinkedIn, and ResearchGate). The platforms were searched for profile pictures and pronouns used within the author’s profiles (cf., Curiel et al, 2020; Li et al, 2018; McSweeney et al, 2000; Nosik et al, 2018; Poling et al, 2009). This method allowed the researcher to categorize all but 37 authors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%