2020 Ieee Region 10 Conference (Tencon) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/tencon50793.2020.9293797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Recognition using in-built Inertial Sensors of Smartphone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gender classification task is usually conducted alongside human identification, and human re-identification tasks ( Lu et al, 2014 ) since a person’s gender can serve as a soft feature in identifying a person. For instance, gender classification is done first to prune a subset of subjects before human identification is performed ( Castro et al, 2017 ), ( Meena and Sarawadekar, 2020 ). Gender classification is also done first to improve the accuracy of a subsequent age estimation algorithm ( Zhang S. et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Gait Based Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gender classification task is usually conducted alongside human identification, and human re-identification tasks ( Lu et al, 2014 ) since a person’s gender can serve as a soft feature in identifying a person. For instance, gender classification is done first to prune a subset of subjects before human identification is performed ( Castro et al, 2017 ), ( Meena and Sarawadekar, 2020 ). Gender classification is also done first to improve the accuracy of a subsequent age estimation algorithm ( Zhang S. et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Gait Based Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors achieved an accuracy of 76.8% by processing with Support Vector Machines (SVM) and bagging algorithms. Meena and Saeawadekar [116] presented an approach for gender recognition based on the gait data extracted from smartphone sensors. The authors achieved an accuracy of 96.3% using the bagged tree classiier.…”
Section: Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5], the gender of the users was determined with an accuracy of 76.8% by processing with Support Vector Machines (SVM) and bagging algorithms their walking patterns acquired by a smartphone motion sensors. Meena and Saeawadekar [103] based their work on Ensemble Boosted Tree (EBT) and achieved an accuracy of 96.3%. The authors in [135] also focused on gender recognition from the data extracted by the accelerometer and gyroscope, obtaining an accuracy of 80%.…”
Section: A Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model produced an accuracy of 76.8% using support vector machines (SVMs), and bagging algorithms. Moreover, the authors of [ 122 ] described an approach for recognition of gender data using gait (walking) data, which were collected by the mobile sensors. The reported accuracy was 96.3%, and the process used the bagged tree classifier.…”
Section: Proper Management Of Sensitive Private Datamentioning
confidence: 99%