Gender-related Differences in Research Productivity, Position, and Advancement Among Academic Orthopaedic Faculty Within the United States

Abstract

Introduction: The number of female residents in orthopaedic surgery is rising; however, orthopaedics currently has the lowest percentage of women among all medical specialties. The Hirsch index (h-index) is a metric used to determine research productivity, an important factor for academic promotion in the field of orthopaedics. The purpose of this study was to compare research productivity (using the h-index) among male and female orthopaedic surgeons at academic residency programs within the United States. Methods: The websites for all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States were evaluated and the following information was collected: geographic region of the institution, sex, specialty, academic rank, and institutional leadership positions of faculty members. The h-index for each faculty member was collected from the Web of Science Database. Results: H-indices of 4,323 academic orthopaedic surgeons from 160 residency programs in the United States were collected. In total, 1,587 faculty members were assistant professors (220, 13.9% women), 839 were associate professors (91, 10.8% women), 902 were professors (50, 5.5% women), and academic rank was not specified for 991 (74, 7.5% women). One hundred forty-three faculty members held the position of department chair (2, 1.4% women) and 701 were division chiefs (58, 8.3% women). In geographic regions with a greater proportion of female orthopaedic faculty members, women had greater research productivity. Among Department Chairs, associate professors, and professors there was no difference in research productivity between male and female academic orthopaedic surgeons. By contrast, among assistant professors, there was a significant difference in research productivity. Conclusion: A higher proportion of female faculty in an orthopaedic department was positively associated with increased female research productivity. Female faculty at the highest ranks and leadership positions are as academically productive as their male counterparts. Despite similar research productivity, female orthopaedic surgeons are not nearly as well represented as their male counterparts in orthopaedics in general and in leadership positions within the field. In addition, a significantly smaller research productivity among female assistant professors disappears at the higher ranks in comparison to their male counterparts. This indicates a critical gap in factors that influence research productivity according to sex at the most junior faculty rank. Level of Evidence: Level III

Gender Differences in Academic Grades versus Absenteeism for Medical Sciences Students

“…Here, subjective assessments of answers such as short essay questions and multiple-choice questions framed according to the course learning outcomes are all considered to analyze the impact of absenteeism rates on the overall grade. Having found a gender-wise similarity in results in two consecutive semesters can refer to consistency in teaching as explained in the context of accreditation standards, and support the hypothesis that female students are more productive and better presented than their male counterparts in medical sciences with gaps in the factors that drive this in uence [34,35]. As the process of assessing the quality of teaching and learning is underway for the purpose of national accreditation, accreditation standards were applied including learning outcomes evaluation using rubrics, performance indicators, and updating course learning outcomes to be aligned with the program outcomes.…”

Bibliometric Analysis of the English Musculoskeletal Literature over the Last 30 Years

“…In medicine, even after residency training, women have a more difficult time advancing compared to men in the same field [ 59 – 63 ]. Currently ∼50% of medical school graduates are women [ 64 ], yet only 21% of full-time professor positions within medicine are held by women [ 65 ].…”

Effect of absenteeism on the performance of medical sciences students: gender differences

“…Here, subjective assessments of answers such as short-answer essay questions and MCQs were used to analyze the impact of absenteeism on the overall grade. Having found a sex-based similarity in the results across two consecutive semesters reflects consistency in teaching as explained in the context of accreditation standards, and supports that female students are more productive and better presented than their male counterparts in medical sciences with gaps in our awareness and understanding of the factors that drive this influence [ 28 , 29 ]. As the process of assessing the quality of teaching and learning for national accreditation is ongoing, the accreditation standards were applied including learning outcome evaluation using rubrics, performance indicators, and aligning the course learning outcomes with the program outcomes.…”