2020
DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2020.1799768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender-related differences in the psychological impact of confinement as a consequence of COVID-19 in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

32
157
5
12

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
32
157
5
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, against expectations, having been infected with SARS-CoV-2 or being a health risk group (i.e., diabetes, lung or heart disease) were not significantly related to a higher risk of overall distress. Gender differences found in our study are consistent with epidemiological studies showing that the lifetime prevalence of any affective disorder in women is almost twice as that of men (Eid et al, 2019) as well as with a recent study in Spain reporting that women showed more depression and anxiety than men during the lockdown (Ausín et al, 2020). Likewise, Henares Montiel et al, Psychological Adjustment in Spain during the COVID-19 9 (2020) found, in three periods analysed, that the frequency of psychological morbidity was higher in women than in men: 26.7% vs. 15.3% in 2006, 26.1% vs. 17.5% in 2011, and 22.8% vs. 14.6% in 2017. In line with recent research on the Spanish population (Odriola-González et al, 2020), we found that young people seem to be psychologically penalized by this pandemic despite not being a high-risk group for the transmission of COVID-19.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, against expectations, having been infected with SARS-CoV-2 or being a health risk group (i.e., diabetes, lung or heart disease) were not significantly related to a higher risk of overall distress. Gender differences found in our study are consistent with epidemiological studies showing that the lifetime prevalence of any affective disorder in women is almost twice as that of men (Eid et al, 2019) as well as with a recent study in Spain reporting that women showed more depression and anxiety than men during the lockdown (Ausín et al, 2020). Likewise, Henares Montiel et al, Psychological Adjustment in Spain during the COVID-19 9 (2020) found, in three periods analysed, that the frequency of psychological morbidity was higher in women than in men: 26.7% vs. 15.3% in 2006, 26.1% vs. 17.5% in 2011, and 22.8% vs. 14.6% in 2017. In line with recent research on the Spanish population (Odriola-González et al, 2020), we found that young people seem to be psychologically penalized by this pandemic despite not being a high-risk group for the transmission of COVID-19.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, females were found to be more likely to suffer higher psychological stress. This result was consistent with the previous study, which also found that female may be associated with the worse psychological status during COVID-19 epidemic [24,25].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, the female gender is a predictor of anxiety and PTSD, and this group may also be identified as more vulnerable, perhaps due to the greater burden that may arise from combining work or telework with childcare and other gender roles during the pandemic (32). The role of gender has been further studied in detail in this same sample, concluding that women have shown a greater psychological impact during confinement and highlighting the need of special attention for this group (33). On the other hand, in relation to post-traumatic symptomatology, the variables of working on site vs. teleworking or not working arise as a predictor in this model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%