1991
DOI: 10.2752/089279391787057170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, Sex Role Orientation, and Attitudes toward Animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
243
5
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
33
243
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The gender is the primary reason to show a definite trend in most of the studies aiming to determine an a�itude towards the animal rights and AUR, and females represent a more zoo-centric trend than males in these ma�ers (Gallup and Beckstead, 1988;Herzog et al, 1991;Driscoll, 1992;Broida et al, 1993;Furnham and Heyes, 1993;Eldridge and Gluck, 1996;Pifer, 1996;Ozen et al, 2004). The results of this study also proved that the female participants were closer to the zoo-centric line than males in both the groups of the educators and the students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The gender is the primary reason to show a definite trend in most of the studies aiming to determine an a�itude towards the animal rights and AUR, and females represent a more zoo-centric trend than males in these ma�ers (Gallup and Beckstead, 1988;Herzog et al, 1991;Driscoll, 1992;Broida et al, 1993;Furnham and Heyes, 1993;Eldridge and Gluck, 1996;Pifer, 1996;Ozen et al, 2004). The results of this study also proved that the female participants were closer to the zoo-centric line than males in both the groups of the educators and the students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…One of these variables was gender. Different psychological studies have demonstrated gender differences in attitudes towards animals, all indicating that women had more positive attitudes towards animals than men [8,[20][21][22]. Furthermore, Hills [21] indicated that within farmers, women had more positive attitudes towards animals, having also higher empathy scores than men.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human supremacy was assessed with six items (α = .89), e.g., "The life of an animal is just not of equal value as the life of a human being" (see Appendix). Eight items of the Animal Attitude Scale measured attitudes toward animal exploitation (α = .74), e.g., "The use of animals such as rabbits for testing the safety of cosmetics and household products is unnecessary and should be stopped" (reverse-scored) (Herzog, Betchard, & Pittman, 1991). Higher scores indicated greater acceptance of animal exploitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%