2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender similarities and differences in dishonesty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there has been a tradition of materially pampering daughters more than sons in some areas of China ( Kim et al, 2018 ), which might have lead to the observed positive association that females reported higher subjective social status than males. Conversely, this may also be the simple result that females inflated their social status more than males in this context ( Kennedy and Kray, 2022 ). The mechanism behind this observation is beyond this study’s scope, but this result would lead to interesting future research examining the gender similarities and differences in the association between real income, subjective social status and mental health conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been a tradition of materially pampering daughters more than sons in some areas of China ( Kim et al, 2018 ), which might have lead to the observed positive association that females reported higher subjective social status than males. Conversely, this may also be the simple result that females inflated their social status more than males in this context ( Kennedy and Kray, 2022 ). The mechanism behind this observation is beyond this study’s scope, but this result would lead to interesting future research examining the gender similarities and differences in the association between real income, subjective social status and mental health conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive correlation between the guesser's winning rate and significantly increased IBS was only in CFM dyads at CH03 (r = 0.59, p = Next, we sought to determine whether the increased IBS was modulated by relationship type and gender composition. The results of ANOVAs showed a main effect of relationship type in a large number of channels (i.e., CHs 1,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,14,16,17,18 at 0.086-0.192 Hz; CHs 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19 at 0.011-0.022 Hz, all FDR-corrected) (see Table S5 in Supplementary Materials). The results also revealed that couple dyads showed more increased IBS than stranger dyads in all significant CHs.…”
Section: Interbrain Synchronization and Behavior Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have revealed gender differences in deceptive behavior, indicating that males cheat more than females, especially with black lies, which benefit the deceiver but cost another person [6,7]. From an evolutionary perspective, this difference can be explained by sexual selection theory, in which males historically faced more substantial incentives and fewer costs for deceptive behavior [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although younger males exhibit higher dishonesty rates (Gerlach et al, 2019; Leib et al, 2021), gender or age is not expected to directly affect social commitments. For gender, it has been argued that men consider possible punishments as less important or have a generally higher disposition for risk-taking, especially in competitive settings (Kennedy & Kray, 2022). For age, it has been speculated that a reduction in dishonesty might be related to reduced risk-taking or an increase in agreeableness with older age (Gerlach et al, 2019).…”
Section: Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%