2000
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108005461.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender‐specific differences in temporomandibular retrodiscal tissues of the goat

Abstract: Healthy, adult, male and female goat temporomandibular retrodiscal tissues were characterized to determine if biochemical differences existed between the genders. RNA concentrations were not different between male and female retrodiscal tissues; however, the DNA concentration in female retrodiscal tissues was 82% greater than in male retrodiscal tissues. Collagen concentrations were significantly greater in male retrodiscal tissues, and this was reflected in significant gender differences of type I and III col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interspecimen variations may be due to disease or developmental states which could not be identified with the naked eye and differences between genders; these factors, disease, development, and gender, are active areas of TMJ research noted throughout the literature. 20,[24][25][26] We included the animal reference number in all ANOVAs to account for this variability in our surface-regional analysis, thus reducing the experimental error associated with interspecimen variations in our ANOVAs. Further refined mechanical models and tighter experimental and specimen controls may be capable of further reducing the estimate variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interspecimen variations may be due to disease or developmental states which could not be identified with the naked eye and differences between genders; these factors, disease, development, and gender, are active areas of TMJ research noted throughout the literature. 20,[24][25][26] We included the animal reference number in all ANOVAs to account for this variability in our surface-regional analysis, thus reducing the experimental error associated with interspecimen variations in our ANOVAs. Further refined mechanical models and tighter experimental and specimen controls may be capable of further reducing the estimate variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functionally, the bovine TMJ exhibits lateral translatory movements and the frequency of mastication in cattle is almost similar to that in humans although cattle have much greater excursions than humans (26,27). Meanwhile, the retrodiscal area in humans can be quite different from that in other animals (28,29). In human, the retrodiscal tissues are highly vascular and are believed to fill the glenoid fossa as it is vacated by the condyle during jaw opening.…”
Section: Viscoelastic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%