2019
DOI: 10.1080/14015439.2019.1617894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender-specific reference ranges of the vocal extent measure in young and healthy adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous studies, healthy subjects (VII) reached the highest VEM and DSI values while assessing their voices being not impaired [ 7 , 16 ]. They could be clearly separated from patients with voice disorders by VEM and all other examined parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to previous studies, healthy subjects (VII) reached the highest VEM and DSI values while assessing their voices being not impaired [ 7 , 16 ]. They could be clearly separated from patients with voice disorders by VEM and all other examined parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The first investigation [ 8 ] presented a rough VEM classification deduced from 564 patients with different types of voice disorders, based on the quartiles of the VEM data (≥106: normal vocal capacity; <106 to ≥89: mildly reduced; <89 to ≥64: moderately reduced; <64: severely reduced vocal capacity). The second study [ 16 ] introduced gender-specific VEM means (M ± SD) and reference ranges (RR = M ± 1.96 × SD) for young and healthy males (124 ± 13; RR: 99-148) and females (114 ± 13; RR: 88-141). Even though it would simplify the interpretation of vocal complaints in different pathologies and allow for better evaluation of expectable treatment success, more precise and comprehensive data regarding different types of voice disorders as well as healthy voices are not yet available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VHI-9i responses from the present series indicate a better vocal QoL than those reported in the literature do for patients with voice-affecting pathologies (Table VI) [45,46,48,56]. It is interesting-and logical-to note that the adolescents assessed by the speech therapist as having no phonation impairment had a mean total VHI-9i score less than six (5.8 ± 4.7), indicating a normal voice, whereas those assessed with low or moderate impairment were above that threshold (7.9 ± 5.1) indicating a mild phonation disorder.…”
Section: Vocal-specific Quality Of Lifesupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Responses to the nine questions are noted on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (always) and the total score ranges from 0 to 36 [44]. Scores from 0 to 5, from 6 to 10, from 11 to 16 and from 17 to 36, indicate respectively no, mild, moderate and severe vocal disorders [45,46]. Those thresholds were used to interpret the VHI-9i results of the present cohort and compare them to results reported in four other series on adult patients with voice disorders [45,[47][48][49].…”
Section: The Voice Handicap Index: Vocal Qolmentioning
confidence: 99%