Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Russian scholars who want to study the Roman Empire, its provinces, and theoretical aspects of Roman imperialism face issues such as the notable disfavour for theoretical re-thinking and debate (a striking contrast to Western academia). This has largely been determined by specific features of Russian academic tradition that have seen it distance from an anti-imperialist and Marxist political tool towards a neutral space that is anti-ideology with a bias against ‘hot’ topics. Other problems are created by the political context and socio-economic conditions of academics. To add to this, scholars are underpaid, underrated, overexploited, and act within a specific public discourse that is filled with imperial nostalgia. This paper discusses these issues and some of the key features of contemporary Russian scholarship on the Roman Empire and imperialism; special attention is given to Marxist legacy of Soviet scholarship and its potential for future studies of the Roman Empire. Possible strategies to deal with these factors are briefly discussed at the end.
Russian scholars who want to study the Roman Empire, its provinces, and theoretical aspects of Roman imperialism face issues such as the notable disfavour for theoretical re-thinking and debate (a striking contrast to Western academia). This has largely been determined by specific features of Russian academic tradition that have seen it distance from an anti-imperialist and Marxist political tool towards a neutral space that is anti-ideology with a bias against ‘hot’ topics. Other problems are created by the political context and socio-economic conditions of academics. To add to this, scholars are underpaid, underrated, overexploited, and act within a specific public discourse that is filled with imperial nostalgia. This paper discusses these issues and some of the key features of contemporary Russian scholarship on the Roman Empire and imperialism; special attention is given to Marxist legacy of Soviet scholarship and its potential for future studies of the Roman Empire. Possible strategies to deal with these factors are briefly discussed at the end.
Понятие «отдача от высшего образования» в современном российском обществе многомерно. Со стороны получающего высшее образование субъекта это временные, интеллектуальные, финансовые инвестиции в формирование успешной профессиональной карьеры, со стороны общества — стратегическое предвосхищение движущих сил общественного прогресса на основе человеческого капитала, наращиваемого в процессе образования и реализации его результатов. Целью статьи является анализ отдачи от высшего образования с использованием социально-психологического и социально-экономического подходов в отношении таких факторов, как индивидуальные характеристики субъекта образования, особенности родительской семьи, гендерные особенности, семейное положение и наличие детей, качество вуза, перспективы студента и выпускника вуза на рынке труда. Возможность раскрыть психологическую составляющую экономических детерминант отдачи от высшего образования определило новизну и теоретическую значимость исследования. Подробно рассмотрены практические вопросы динамики получения высшего образования студентами, заработной платы выпускников вуза. Результатом исследования стало утверждение полидисциплинарной оценки отдачи от высшего образования, в которой социально-психологические аспекты выполняют роль нематериальных предикторов. Основные направления дальнейших исследований связываются с анализом изменений форматов образовательного пространства вузов и включением социально-психологических аспектов, наряду с заработной платой, в число нематериальных активов отдачи от высшего образовании в условиях цифровой экономики. The notion of higher education efficiency is multifaceted and can be viewed from a variety of perspectives in modern Russia. Students acquiring higher education invest their intellect and their money to ensure their professional efficiency and professional prosperity. Due to human capital intensification, the community can prepare to efficiently meet progress-associated challenges. The aim of the article is to analyze higher education efficiency through the use of social-psychological and social-economic approaches in relation to such factors as students’ individual characteristics, family characteristics, gender peculiarities, marital status and children, higher education quality, career prospects. The research focuses on psychological aspects of economic determinants of higher education efficiency, which predetermines the novelty and theoretical significance of the research. The article focuses on practical issues of higher education acquisition and university graduates’ career prospects. The research highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary assessment of higher education efficiency, where social and psychological aspects serve as non-material predictors. Future research should focus on the analysis of the changing educational environment. Social-psychological aspects and salary prospects should be investigated as non-material assets of higher education and indices of higher education efficiency in the conditions of digital economy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.