Gendered perceptions of tigers in Chitwan National Park, Nepal

Abstract

The survival of many populations of threatened mammals depends on the willingness of human communities to coexist with them. Gender is an important factor because men and women often have different perceptions of wildlife that influence their willingness to coexist with wildlife. While previous studies have hypothesized what may drive gendered perceptions of wildlife, research investigating the underlying drivers of these differences is lacking, especially in developing countries. The objective of this paper is to identify the underlying drivers of gendered differences in attitude toward globally endangered tigers (Panthera tigris) in Chitwan National Park (CNP), Nepal, where women are less likely to have a positive attitude. To accomplish this, we administered a social survey to 499 respondents living near the Park. We analyzed survey data using nested linear regression models and decomposition analysis. Over 90% of the gender gap in attitude was explained through these analyses, with beliefs about tigers (e.g., benefits and costs) explaining two-thirds of the gap. The belief that tigers contribute to a healthy ecosystem, by itself, accounted for one-third of the gender gap. Socioeconomic characteristics explained 12% and experiences with tigers and perceptions of and control over risk each accounted for 6% or less of the gender gap. These results suggest that beliefs, rather than socioeconomics, experience, or risk, underlie the majority of the gendered differences in attitudes toward tigers in CNP and that an appreciation of the ecosystem value of tigers plays a key role in people's positive attitudes. Analyses of gendered differences in attitudes is important for developing conservation interventions that address perspectives and issues of the entire population.

Factors Influencing People's Response Toward Tiger Translocation in Satkosia Tiger Reserve, Eastern India

“…While education in general has been known to be positively associated with attitude toward reintroductions (Williams et al, 2002), people with higher education are possibly better equipped to assess the costs and benefits associated with translocation and perceive it as non-beneficial. Also, the attitude of people was found to differ by gender, where women are more supportive of tiger conservation as compared to men, which is contrary to other sites where women are more apprehensive of tiger (Bhattarai and Fischer, 2014;Carter and Allendorf, 2016;Gray et al, 2017).…”

Human–wildlife coexistence: attitudes and behavioural intentions towards predators in the Maasai Mara, Kenya

“…However, recent research has shown that women value benefits, such as conservancy membership, differently to men (Keane et al, 2016) and that women may be less tolerant towards predators than men (e.g. Carter & Allendorf, 2016; Harvey et al, 2017). We would therefore advise that women are included in future surveys relating to attitudes and behavioural intentions towards predators.…”

Gender Concerns When Noah the Economist Ranks Biodiversity Protection Policies

“…However, gender differentiated agricultural roles have been reported broadly, including in South Asia by Agarwal (2000), Upadhyay (2005), and Narayanan and Kumar (2007); in West Asia by Abdelali-Martini et al (2008); in Mexico by Rimarachin Rimarachin Cabrera et al (2001) and Chambers and Chambers and Momsen (2007); and in Africa by Mackenzie (2003) and Howard and Nabanoga (2007). Similarly, Allendorf has documented gender differentiated ecological knowledge with respect to tigers in Nepal (Carter and Allendorf 2016) and a nature reserve in China (Allendorf and Yang 2017) resulting from gender differentiated roles.…”