Gendered Risk Perceptions Associated with Human-Wildlife Conflict: Implications for Participatory Conservation

Abstract

This research aims to foster discourse about the extent to which gender is important to consider within the context of participatory approaches for biological conservation. Our objectives are to: (1) gender-disaggregate data about stakeholders' risk perceptions associated with human-wildlife conflict (HWC) in a participatory conservation context, and (2) highlight insights from characterizing gendered similarities and differences in the way people think about HWC-related risks. Two communal conservancies in Caprivi, Namibia served as case study sites. We analyzed data from focus groups (n = 2) to create gendered concept maps about risks to wildlife and livelihoods and any associations of those risks with HWC, and semi-structured interviews (n = 76; men = 38, women = 38) to measure explicit risk attitudes associated with HWC. Concept maps indicated some divergent perceptions in how groups characterized risks to wildlife and livelihoods; however, not only were identified risks to wildlife (e.g., pollution, hunting) dissimilar in some instances, descriptions of risks varied as well. Study groups reported similar risk perceptions associated with HWC with the exception of worry associated with HWC effects on local livelihoods. Gendered differences in risk perceptions may signal different priorities or incentives to participate in efforts to resolve HWC-related risks. Thus, although shared goals and interests may seem to be an obvious reason for cooperative wildlife management, it is not always obvious that management goals are shared. Opportunity exists to move beyond thinking about gender as an explanatory variable for understanding how different groups think about participating in conservation activities.

An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human–predator relations

“…Certain groups within communities (defined by class, gender, caste, or ethnicity) are more or less likely to experience predator attacks (Gore & Kahler 2012).…”

Rethinking Corruption in Conservation Crime: Insights from Madagascar

“…). Drawing on our research experiences elsewhere (e.g., Gore and Kahler ; Kahler et al . ), we employed two explicit measures to limit biased responses.…”

“…The field team electronically transcribed each interview's digital recording; comments not relayed in English were discussed and agreed upon by consensus to maximize translation validity for future analysis (Miles and Huberman ; Gore & Kahler ). Transcripts were double‐checked by the field research team for validity (see Supplemental Material for information about data collection procedures, reliability and validity in data collection and processing).…”

Consideration of reference points for the management of renewable resources under an adaptive management paradigm

“…dimensions have overshadowed the application of AM (Rist et al 2013), and are also relevant for viewing RPs. The various forms of uncertainty encountered in natural-resource management (for example Hilborn 1987;Johnson et al 1997;Landres et al 1999;Regan et al 2002;Gore & Kahler 2012;Kujala et al 2013) include some that are largely irreducible (such as natural variability) as well as others that can be reduced via directed management actions (such as structural uncertainty). These multiple forms of uncertainty compel assumptions throughout the management process, even if both the amount of uncertainty and its composition vary across management scenarios.…”