Ferrara and Srihari argue in this issue of Psychiatric Services (1) that women are disadvantaged relative to men in early intervention services for first-episode psychosis in the United States. According to a recent report, 23 is the mean age of participants in such services (2), probably because many early intervention programs set an age limit on entry. Most patients in these intervention services are men (2). It has been acknowledged that in many countries, current early intervention programs are gender and age inequitable (3). Relatively few women receive these services, and those who do constitute an underserved minority, both with respect to the number of individuals receiving services and to their stage in life at which they receive services. For men, first episodes of psychosis occur predominantly among young individuals, whereas they can occur among women at all ages (4). Whatever the precise diagnosis, the emergence of psychosis is brought to clinical attention earlier for men than for women, perhaps because men are more likely to abuse substances that precipitate or unmask psychotic symptoms or because police involvement and involuntary hospitalization are more prevalent among men (4).As a result of the young age of first-episode service participants, current mental health care programming primarily addresses the challenges of the early twenties, namely independence from parents, completion of education, vocational training, expansion of social networks, substance abuse prevention, and development of intimate relationships. Even if there are no age limits to service entry, the needs of older individuals, both men and women, remain relatively neglected (3). Individuals who develop psychotic illness at older ages face problems with employment, finances, housing, marriage, pregnancy and postpartum challenges, worsening health, parenting dilemmas, the burden of care for aging parents, and bereavement-themes that lend themselves to therapy but do not, at present, form a regular part of first-episode psychosis programming.This lack of programming for older adults is understandable. The emphasis on early intervention originated in the hope that "catching" (and halting) a disease in the young when it first begins, or even before it begins, prevents what used to be called