2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals

Abstract: Here we conducted a large-scale genetic association analysis of educational attainment in a sample of approximately 1.1 million individuals and identify 1,271 independent genome-wide-significant SNPs. For the SNPs taken together, we found evidence of heterogeneous effects across environments. The SNPs implicate genes involved in brain-development processes and neuron-to-neuron communication. In a separate analysis of the X chromosome, we identify 10 independent genome-wide-significant SNPs and estimate a SNP h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

89
2,733
3
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,222 publications
(2,995 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
89
2,733
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These weighted NEO PI‐R/3 (a) domain and (b) facet scores were then averaged, yielding either DRS or FRS. We included all NEO PI‐R/3 domains in DRS and all facets in FRS regardless of the magnitude or significance of their respective meta‐analytic weights, as many papers working on polygenic risk scores have shown that the best prediction can generally be achieved when all predictors are included in risk scores, no matter the effect size . The observed BMI was then predicted from the DRS and FRS (all expressed in z scores), controlling for sex, age, age 2 , and education.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These weighted NEO PI‐R/3 (a) domain and (b) facet scores were then averaged, yielding either DRS or FRS. We included all NEO PI‐R/3 domains in DRS and all facets in FRS regardless of the magnitude or significance of their respective meta‐analytic weights, as many papers working on polygenic risk scores have shown that the best prediction can generally be achieved when all predictors are included in risk scores, no matter the effect size . The observed BMI was then predicted from the DRS and FRS (all expressed in z scores), controlling for sex, age, age 2 , and education.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poly‐trait risk score represents as much variance in BMI that can be collectively predicted by the set of traits, be they domains or facets. This approach has already been successfully used in personality research, and it is conceptually very similar to polygenic risk scores widely used in genetics . We expect FRS to explain more variance in BMI than DRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, these individuals may have greater scholastic aspirations and be more likely to seek out educational opportunities beyond high school. Across studies, the variance accounted for by polygenic contributions for educational attainment and higher education has ranged from 2% to 13% . Variability in the variance accounted for by the EA PGS across studies may be due to differences in the sizes of the discovery samples, with smaller discovery samples yielding less robust effect sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern research has shown that such traits are shaped through gene × environment interactions, epigenetics, environment, and chance (Caspi & Moffitt, ; Enoch, ; Graves, ; Haberstick et al, ; Keller, ; MacMahon, ; Okbay et al, ). Moreover, genome‐wide association studies have established that only 0.01–0.035% of the variability in educational attainment is associated with any single gene variant (23andMe Research Team et al, ; Okbay et al, ). The combined contribution of all of these genomic variants to any group level difference in a complex human trait is predicted to be small, possibly spurious, and largely dependent on the environment according to population genetic theory (Rosenberg et al, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%