2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-006-0277-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene expression analysis of wild Leishmania major isolates: identification of genes preferentially expressed in amastigotes

Abstract: Trying to identify virulence genes of wild Leishmania (L.) major parasites, the species responsible for zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis, we compared, using differential display technique, gene expression in two L. major isolates obtained from human lesions and characterized by their contrasting pathogenicity in the BALB/c mouse model. The analysis was performed on amastigotes derived from BALB/c mice lesions. A total of 13 different clones were identified, but the use of reverse transcription and real-time po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1), whereas previous reports indicated that OPB is upregulated in amastigotes of L. braziliensis and L. donovani compared with promastigotes [17, 18]. The higher expression reported for L. braziliensis amastigotes was based on RNA levels detected using differential display methodology [17]; interestingly, OPB was not one of the genes found to have higher expression in L. major amastigotes in another differential display analysis [19]. Microarray analysis of RNA expressed at differential levels between promastigotes and amastigotes of L. mexicana similarly revealed no change for OPB [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1), whereas previous reports indicated that OPB is upregulated in amastigotes of L. braziliensis and L. donovani compared with promastigotes [17, 18]. The higher expression reported for L. braziliensis amastigotes was based on RNA levels detected using differential display methodology [17]; interestingly, OPB was not one of the genes found to have higher expression in L. major amastigotes in another differential display analysis [19]. Microarray analysis of RNA expressed at differential levels between promastigotes and amastigotes of L. mexicana similarly revealed no change for OPB [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Detection of OPB activity in the growth medium demonstrated the release of OPB by L. donovani promastigotes [16]. OPB is up-regulated in the amastigote stage of the life-cycle in L. braziliensis and L. donovani compared with promastigotes [17, 18], whereas there are similar levels of expression of OPB in all stages in L. major and L. mexicana [19, 20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DD analysis is one of the methods that can be used for comparing large numbers of mRNA between 2 samples. It has been validated in different organisms and, among others, allowed identification of genes preferentially expressed in amastigotes of L. (L.) major (Ouakad et al 2007) as well as a putative virulence factor (Ben Achour et al 2002). This approach is complementary to other gene expression methodological approaches like suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH, Diatchenko et al 1996) or micro-arrays (Saxena et al 2003; Almeida et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to verify whether gRNA loss did occur in L. braziliensis strain M2904, a complete characterization of both maxicircle and minicircle sequences needs to be done, and a comparison with those of recent isolates of this species should be carried out. Furthermore, determination of possible differences in RNA editing between promastigotes and amastigotes, using serial analysis of gene expression (Ouakad et al 2007;Li et al 2008), would help to deciphering the actual importance of this process in Leishmania. This is likewise the emphasis in the next stage of our research.…”
Section: Concluding Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%