2004
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Expression Profiling in Uveal Melanoma Reveals Two Molecular Classes and Predicts Metastatic Death

Abstract: Melanomas are notoriously difficult to classify because of a lack of discrete clinical and pathological stages. Here, we show that primary uveal melanomas surprisingly cluster into two distinct molecular classes based on gene expression profile. Genes that discriminate class 1 (low-grade) from class 2 (high-grade) include highly significant clusters of downregulated genes on chromosome 3 and up-regulated genes on chromosome 8q, which is consistent with previous cytogenetic studies. A three-gene signature allow… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

13
576
0
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 664 publications
(610 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
13
576
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, several genetic tests have been shown to aid prognostic prediction. Chromosome 3 loss, 19 BAP1 loss, 11 and RNA expression profiling 20,21 have high predictive values in terms of forecasting the course of disease and the risk of metastasis. SF3B1 codon 625 mutations also appear to be a genetic marker of good prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, several genetic tests have been shown to aid prognostic prediction. Chromosome 3 loss, 19 BAP1 loss, 11 and RNA expression profiling 20,21 have high predictive values in terms of forecasting the course of disease and the risk of metastasis. SF3B1 codon 625 mutations also appear to be a genetic marker of good prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advances include newer formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue extraction protocols, cDNA-mediated annealing, selection, extension and ligation, the addition of random hexamer priming to oligo(dT) priming and newly developed array platforms with redesigned probes. [30][31][32][33][34]57,[67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] Although sensitivity is low, high specificity and positive predictive value suggest that transcript detection is reliable from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. 33 Although RNA isolation techniques from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues have improved, problems remain, largely because of the greater fragmented nature of RNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcription profiling studies have provided evidence for distinct molecular subclasses of melanoma (Bittner et al 2000;Segal et al 2003;Tschentscher et al 2003;Onken et al 2004;Haqq et al 2005). At the genomic DNA level, the nonrandom nature of the chromosomal alterations characteristic of melanoma likely also dictates disease behavior; thus, patterns of alterations detectable at either the DNA or RNA level may segregate melanoma tumors into subtypes with distinct clinical behaviors and possibly therapeutic responses.…”
Section: Genomic Heterogeneity Of Melanomamentioning
confidence: 99%