2011
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Loss and Parallel Evolution Contribute to Species Difference in Flower Color

Abstract: Although the importance of regulatory and functional sequence evolution in generating species differences has been studied to some extent, much less is known about the role of other types of genomic changes, such as fluctuation in gene copy number. Here, we apply analyses of gene function and expression of anthocyanin pigment pathway genes, as well as cosegregation analyses in backcross populations, to examine the genetic changes involved in the shift from blue to red flowers in Andean Iochroma (Solanaceae). W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
189
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
9
189
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This QTL corresponds to the gene F3 0 5 0 h. Wessinger & Rausher [13] demonstrated using co-segregation and functional analyses that this gene is redundantly non-functional in P. barbatus and completely explains the difference in flower colour between the two species. Similar large effect flower colour QTLs have been reported frequently for adaptation to different pollinators between pairs of species within Aquilegia [35], Ipomopsis [15], Iris [14,17], Iochroma [36], Mimulus [9,37] and Petunia [10,18]. One partial explanation for this pattern is that many flower colour transitions involve deactivation of parts or all of the anthocyanin pathway, which can be accomplished by inactivating mutations in one or a few genes [10,13,36 -38].…”
Section: Discussion (A) Genetic Basis Of Pollination Syndrome Traits supporting
confidence: 58%
“…This QTL corresponds to the gene F3 0 5 0 h. Wessinger & Rausher [13] demonstrated using co-segregation and functional analyses that this gene is redundantly non-functional in P. barbatus and completely explains the difference in flower colour between the two species. Similar large effect flower colour QTLs have been reported frequently for adaptation to different pollinators between pairs of species within Aquilegia [35], Ipomopsis [15], Iris [14,17], Iochroma [36], Mimulus [9,37] and Petunia [10,18]. One partial explanation for this pattern is that many flower colour transitions involve deactivation of parts or all of the anthocyanin pathway, which can be accomplished by inactivating mutations in one or a few genes [10,13,36 -38].…”
Section: Discussion (A) Genetic Basis Of Pollination Syndrome Traits supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Although these assumptions are strengthened by parallels with ecological speciation [74], they ignore the genetic mechanisms underlying colour polymorphism, which may differ among species and constrain certain evolutionary outcomes. Different mutations can produce the same or similar pigment patterns in congeneric and even conspecific plants or animals, but each mutation may nevertheless have its own set of pleiotropic effects [29,75,76]. In plants, mutations that halt anthocyanin production may occur in structural genes for the flavonoid biochemical pathway or in transcription factor regions, with the latter presumed more tissue-specific and the former more deleterious for their plant-wide effects on the pathway by-products, including compounds that reduce physiological stress or herbivory [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this aspect, the inheritance mode resembles other typically irreversible transitions, such as the transition from outcrossing to selfing and from hermaphroditism to dioecy (69). In plants, for example, the shift from blue to red flowers in Andean Iochroma (Solanaceae) is irreversible; molecular studies suggest that loss of a gene encoding an enzyme in the anthocyanin pathway is needed for the transition, which limits the opportunity for later reversal to the ancestral state (69,70). Accordingly, the transition from induction to inheritance could, in principle, be made irreversible by a single gene mutation or gene loss in the induction pathway.…”
Section: Is the Transition To Inheritance Mode Irreversible And Convementioning
confidence: 99%