Background
Myeloid neoplasms (MN) tend to relapse and deteriorate. Exploring the genomic mutation landscape of MN using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) is a great measure to clarify the mechanism of oncogenesis and progression of MN.
Methods
This multicenter retrospective study investigated 303 patients with MN using NGS from 2019 to 2021. The characteristics of the mutation landscape in the MN subgroups and the clinical value of gene variants were analyzed.
Results
At least one mutation was detected in 88.11% of the patients (267/303).
TET2
was the most common mutation in the cohort, followed by
GATA2, ASXL1, FLT3, DNMT3A
, and
TP53
. Among patients with myeloid leukemia (ML), multivariate analysis showed that patients aged ≥60 years had lower overall survival (OS,
p
= 0.004). Further analysis showed
TET2, NPM1, SRSF2
, and
IDH1
gene mutations, and epigenetic genes (
p
< 0.050) presented significantly higher frequency in older patients. In patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myelodysplastic neoplasms (MPN), univariate analysis showed that
BCORL1
had a significant impact on OS (
p
= 0.040); however, in multivariate analysis, there were no factors significantly associated with OS. Differential analysis of genetic mutations showed
FLT3, TP53, MUC16, SRSF2
, and
KDM5A
mutated more frequently (
p
< 0.050) in secondary acute myeloid leukemia (s‐AML) than in MDS and MPN.
TP53, U2AF1, SRSF2
, and
KDM5A
were mutated more frequently (
p
< 0.050) in s‐AML than in primary AML.
KDM5A
was observed to be restricted to patients with s‐AML in this study, and only co‐occurred with
MUC16
and
TP53
(2/2, 100%). Another mutation was
MUC16
, and its co‐occurrence pattern differed between s‐AML and AML. MUC16 mutations co‐occurred with
KDM5A
and
TP53
in 66.7% (2/3) of patients with s‐AML and co‐occurred with
CEBPA
in 100% (4/4) of patients with AML.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate different genomic mutation patterns in the MN subgroups and highlight the clinical value of genetic variants.