2020
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene signatures based on therapy responsiveness provide guidance for combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy for lower grade glioma

Abstract: For a long time, the guidance for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for lower grade glioma (LGG) lacks instructions on the application timing and order of radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. We, therefore, aimed to develop indicators to distinguish between the different beneficiaries of RT and chemotherapy, which would provide more accurate guidance for combined chemoradiotherapy. By analysing 942 primary LGG samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) databases, we trained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the high-quality group, nine [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and one [29] confer high and acceptable accuracy, respectively. Common advantages and additional luminous points in the high-quality group are shown.…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the high-quality group, nine [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and one [29] confer high and acceptable accuracy, respectively. Common advantages and additional luminous points in the high-quality group are shown.…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By clustering four different microarray experiments, Kim et al built a radiotherapeutic response prediction signature [ 7 ] containing 31 genes. The 31-gene signature has been validated in independent clinical datasets of different cancer types, including glioblastoma [ 8 ], low-grade gliomas [ 9 ], head and neck tumours [ 10 ], and oesophageal cancer [ 11 ]. Eschrich et al constructed the tumour radiosensitivity index (RSI) [ 12 ], which has also been verified in a number of different types of tumour datasets [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared two existing gene signatures for predicting radiotherapy response, an Rscore 25 and the radiation sensitivity index (RSI) 26 , in the TCGA and CGGA datasets. For the RSI, the 25th percentile of RSI in patients receiving radiotherapy was used as the cutoff value for dividing patients into RS and RR groups, as in previous studies 22 , 27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%