In the USA, over 300,000 electronic pacemakers are implanted annually to treat slow heart rates resulting from abnormal sinus or atrioventricular (AV) node function. Although life-saving, limitations and problems with this hardware-based approach have led to interest in using gene and cell delivery methods to develop purely biological based therapies. The goal in creating a biological pacemaker or AV bypass is not to replicate the sinus or AV nodes at a cellular or molecular level, but rather to recreate their functionality. There has been more research on biological pacemakers than on AV bypasses, and the former has explored both implantation of endogenously automatic cells and genetic engineering methods, with the latter involving either direct gene delivery or gene delivery to stem cells that are subsequently implanted into the myocardium. This makes use of all the tools of bioinformatics and molecular biology to engineer custom channels with distinct biophysical properties that may be best suited for a specific patient population or implant site. Although various gene products have been targeted as the basis of a biological pacemaker, most recent efforts have focused on the HCN gene family of pacemaker current. These channels open on hyperpolarization, so they contribute current largely during diastole and have minimal impact on action potential duration. Further, these channels directly bind and respond to the adrenergic second messenger cyclic AMP, so autonomic responsiveness is integral to an HCN-based biological pacemaker. Although proof of principle has been demonstrated by a number of laboratories in several model systems, numerous challenges remain to achieve physiologically appropriate rates with sufficient robustness. Before clinical trials can begin, critical issues of safety and persistence of function must first be addressed in long-term animal studies. Even then, the appropriate patient population will be limited until a biological AV bypass is also developed to ensure AV