2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General and emotion-specific neural effects of ketamine during emotional memory formation

Abstract: General and emotion-specific neural effects of ketamine during emotional memory formation, NeuroImage, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.049 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(119 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistent results with those found in univariate analysis not only illustrate the potential of data-driven multivariate methods for analyzing On the other hand, the small number of face images for each expression condition and the low hits did not permit a trial-wise fMRI analysis comparing remembered versus non-remembered items as in the majority of previous studies examining emotional memory effects (e.g. Becker et al, 2017). Future studies using a larger set of face stimuli of each expression are needed to further explore the subsequent memory effect of emotion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consistent results with those found in univariate analysis not only illustrate the potential of data-driven multivariate methods for analyzing On the other hand, the small number of face images for each expression condition and the low hits did not permit a trial-wise fMRI analysis comparing remembered versus non-remembered items as in the majority of previous studies examining emotional memory effects (e.g. Becker et al, 2017). Future studies using a larger set of face stimuli of each expression are needed to further explore the subsequent memory effect of emotion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…On the other hand, the small number of face images and the low number of hits for each expression condition did not permit a sufficiently powered trial-wise fMRI analysis comparing remembered versus non-remembered items as in the majority of previous studies examining emotional memory effects (e.g. Becker et al, 2017; Dolcos et al, 2005). Future studies using a larger set of face stimuli of each expression are needed to further explore the subsequent memory effect of emotional expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Becker et al [ 86 ] investigated ketamine effects on the encoding of negative, neutral and positive images in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Regardless of the emotional content of stimuli ketamine decreased the activation of the right para-hippocampal gyrus and the mPFC during encoding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional connectivity between left amygdala and the ipsilateral frontal orbital cortex was reduced during encoding of negative stimuli. On the other hand, coupling between the left mPFC and right hippocampus was increased irrespective of the emotional content [ 86 ]. Scheidegger et al [ 87 ] investigated ketamine effects under emotional stimulation compared to baseline.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting, however, that every study in Table 1 implemented minimal delays between encoding and retrieval, thereby opening up the possibility that the GABA A PAM manipulations also impacted memory retrieval. When drug effects have been isolated to either encoding or retrieval by implementing delays between these phases, encoding manipulations modulate hit rates (e.g., Ballard, Gallo, & de Wit, 2013; Becker et al, 2017; Weafer et al, 2016a), whereas retrieval manipulations increase false alarm rates (Ballard, Gallo, & de Wit, 2014; Doss, Weafer, Gallo, & de Wit, 2018a, 2018b). Indeed, increases in false alarm rates were observed in the drug conditions of some of the studies in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%