1994
DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(94)90073-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General approach to dose reconstruction in the population exposed as a result of the release of radioactive wastes into the Techa river

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the operations of Mayak PA, the environment around the plant, and especially around the near Techa River, became contaminated (Degteva et al, 1994;Balonov et al, 2006). It is estimated that more than 25,000 residents of the region might have been exposed to radiation due to discharges of radioactive waste into the Techa River.…”
Section: Residents Of the Techa River Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the operations of Mayak PA, the environment around the plant, and especially around the near Techa River, became contaminated (Degteva et al, 1994;Balonov et al, 2006). It is estimated that more than 25,000 residents of the region might have been exposed to radiation due to discharges of radioactive waste into the Techa River.…”
Section: Residents Of the Techa River Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External exposures to g-radiation were primarily from 137 Cs, with some additional exposure from 106 Ru, 95 Zr. Internal exposures largely resulted from use of river water contaminated with 137 Cs, 89 Sr, and 90 Sr for drinking, cooking and other domestic needs (Degteva et al, 1994). Details of the Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS-2000) used to reconstruct external and internal doses are published elsewhere (Degteva et al, 2000a, b;Jacob et al, 2003).…”
Section: Study Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 95% of the total activity was released into the Techa River from March 1950 through November 1951. The primary radionuclides released were 137 Cs and the bone-seeking isotopes of strontium ( 89 Sr and 90 Sr), which accounted for 12.2 and 20.4% of the total discharge, respectively (Degteva et al, 1994).…”
Section: Study Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correct dose was computed as an average of the collective biological dosimetry, with weights based on variances of the measurements for each technique. In this regard, the present study works toward the goal of collective dosimetry for dose reconstruction (16,27,29,82,83). However, comparisons in the scientific literature between biological and physical methods of radiation dosimetry remain infrequent (80,(84)(85)(86).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it provides no information about biological impact; it is not a direct measure of whole-body dose; and it is subject to confounding factors such as the effect of ingested P-emitters (28)(29)(30). The problem of intersample variability in sensitivity to radiation must also be addressed (31).…”
Section: Introduction Collective Radiation Biodosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%