“…When analyzing the data reported in the literature on the profile and occurrence of PhytoPs and PhytoFs in the separate foods and food matrices, it is essential taking into consideration the evolution of the analytical instrumentation throughout the last years. Thus, regarding the detection methods used so far to identify and quantify PhytoPs and PhytoFs in plant matrices and complex biological systems, earlier reports have described different analytical approaches, such as gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC–MS) [ 7 , 8 , 14 , 29 , 31 ], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to a fluorescence detector [ 32 ], nuclear magnetic resonance of 1 H or 13 C [ 33 ], immunological approaches (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay-ELISA) [ 34 ], and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry with tripe quadrupole technology (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) [ 16 , 17 , 27 ]. Although the HPLC–UV analysis method is rapid, its sensitivity and specificity are not high enough to profile and quantify these compounds in complex matrices, especially in complex biological matrices, in which their concentration is frequently at the nanomolar, or even picomolar range.…”