1997
DOI: 10.1049/ip-map:19970507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General edge element approach to lossy and dispersive structures in anisotropic media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We choose t 1 = t 2 = 0.03 mm, w 1 = 0.1 mm, w 2 = 0.05 mm, σ 1 = σ 2 = 5.72 × 10 7 S/m, s = 0.1 mm, h = 0.0635 mm, and ε r = 9.6 for the geometry of the structure. Figures 7–10 plot the solutions for those circuit parameters and they are also close to those in 20. Tables I and II summarize the consumed CPU time T (Seconds) and memory M (Megabytes) for solving the two problems at some frequencies by using the new approach and the conventional approach.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We choose t 1 = t 2 = 0.03 mm, w 1 = 0.1 mm, w 2 = 0.05 mm, σ 1 = σ 2 = 5.72 × 10 7 S/m, s = 0.1 mm, h = 0.0635 mm, and ε r = 9.6 for the geometry of the structure. Figures 7–10 plot the solutions for those circuit parameters and they are also close to those in 20. Tables I and II summarize the consumed CPU time T (Seconds) and memory M (Megabytes) for solving the two problems at some frequencies by using the new approach and the conventional approach.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…We select the top width w = 3 mm, the thickness t = 0.3 mm, the angle θ = 45°, and the conductivity σ = 5.72 × 10 7 S/m for the interconnect, and the height h = 0.638 mm and the permittivity ε r = 9.8 for the substrate of the structure. The solutions for α , β , and Z at the frequency below 50 GHz are plotted in Figures 3–5, respectively, and it is found that they are close to those based on the edge element method in 20. In the second example, we extract the circuit parameters [ R ], [ L ], [ C ], and [ G ] for an asymmetric dual interconnect structure as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The first ten modes for both TE and TM modes are listed in the 11 and T M 11 modes should be degenerate. However, Lagrange FEM yields some difference.…”
Section: A Standard Rectangular Waveguidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of electromagnetism the situation was similar to the one encountered in structural mechanics as discussed in [36,40], where 2D cross-section, 2.5D planar solvers and 3D arbitrary-solvers were discussed. Waveguides simulators widely employed 2.5D formulations where one of the dimensions was eliminated by assuming a particular evolution of the electromagnetic field in that direction [9,32,17]. 2.5D formulations have been also extensively considered for analyzing printed circuits [42,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%