Handbook of Quantitative Criminology 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Growth Mixture Analysis with Antecedents and Consequences of Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
237
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
237
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects of covariates on substance misuse were modeled only indirectly through latent pathways. The pseudoclass draw technique implemented in Mplus (Petras and Masyn, 2010) was used to determine latent pathway membership. This technique uses a method similar to multiple imputation (Rubin, 1987), estimating the relationship between latent pathways and observed substance misuse variables multiple times based on random draws from the posterior probability distribution, calculating the average of each estimate across the multiple random draws, and adjusting its standard error by taking into account the within-and between-random draw variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of covariates on substance misuse were modeled only indirectly through latent pathways. The pseudoclass draw technique implemented in Mplus (Petras and Masyn, 2010) was used to determine latent pathway membership. This technique uses a method similar to multiple imputation (Rubin, 1987), estimating the relationship between latent pathways and observed substance misuse variables multiple times based on random draws from the posterior probability distribution, calculating the average of each estimate across the multiple random draws, and adjusting its standard error by taking into account the within-and between-random draw variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of this simultaneous modeling procedure is that the inclusion of Z in the model can alter the meaning of the classes (Petras & Masyn, 2010), especially when the normal distribution assumption for f (Z i |X = t ) does not hold. Such a misspecification can even lead to overextraction of the classes (Bauer & Curran, 2003).…”
Section: The Basic Lc Model and Its Extension To Include A Continuousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some guidelines for interpreting the absolute IC difference between two models have been proposed. Petras and Masyn (2010) recommended the "elbow criterion" to determine the optimal number of classes when using IC indices (i.e., AIC, BIC, SABIC). Specifically, they recommended graphing the values of IC indices against the increasing number of classes, and looked for the pronounced angle in the plot where the decrease of IC value dropped.…”
Section: Brief Review Of Model Selection Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%