2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General movements as a predictive tool of the neurological outcome in very low and extremely low birth weight infants — A South African perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like in Spittle et al [32] a significant percentage of infants in our study developed no fidgety movements (22% of 97 Australian very preterm infants; 23% in our study). In the South African sample of 125 VLBW infants, only 9% had no fidgety movements [31]. Similarly, in the sample of Stahlmann et al [30] only 8% of 103 VLBW infants showed no fidgety movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like in Spittle et al [32] a significant percentage of infants in our study developed no fidgety movements (22% of 97 Australian very preterm infants; 23% in our study). In the South African sample of 125 VLBW infants, only 9% had no fidgety movements [31]. Similarly, in the sample of Stahlmann et al [30] only 8% of 103 VLBW infants showed no fidgety movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Previous studies carried out in Germany [30], South Africa [31] and Australia [32] demonstrate that the assessment of fidgety movements contributes to the predictability of the motor outcome in VLBW or very preterm infants. Like in Spittle et al [32] a significant percentage of infants in our study developed no fidgety movements (22% of 97 Australian very preterm infants; 23% in our study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies evaluating whether there are differences in GMs between different ethnic or cultural groups are, to the best of our knowledge, not available. Most studies have been performed in Europe, although more studies are now coming also from Brazil, China, Iran and South Africa (9,(16)(17)(18) . It has further been claimed that GMA studies have a risk for bias because study samples are selected retrospectively, based on available video recordings rather than well-defined high-risk cohorts.…”
Section: (8)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observation and assessment of the quality of spontaneous movements in young infants, the so-called general movements (GMs), has arisen as a reliable and valid method for the prediction of severe neurological impairments such as cerebral palsy (CP; Adde et al, 2007;Bruggink et al, 2009a;Burger, Frieg, and Louw, 2011;Prechtl et al, 1997). Normal GMs occur in age-specific patterns and between 9 and 20 weeks postterm age are characterized by small movements of moderate speed and variable accelerations of the neck, trunk, and limbs in all directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%