1996
DOI: 10.1016/0306-3623(95)02034-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General pharmacology of meloxicam-part I: Effects on CNS, gastric emptying, intestinal transport, water, electrolyte and creatinine excretion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with Forsyth et al [17] and with Engelhardt et al [41] the renal biochemical parameters (creatinine and urea) also showed no significant changes except in the piroxicam group, where the urea values were significantly enhanced after 14 days of treatment, which could point to inadequate kidney perfusion. The joint increase of the platelet and urea values, together with normal creatinine values, may be consistent with the upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage [42] observed macroscopically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In agreement with Forsyth et al [17] and with Engelhardt et al [41] the renal biochemical parameters (creatinine and urea) also showed no significant changes except in the piroxicam group, where the urea values were significantly enhanced after 14 days of treatment, which could point to inadequate kidney perfusion. The joint increase of the platelet and urea values, together with normal creatinine values, may be consistent with the upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage [42] observed macroscopically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[17] It has been demonstrated that meloxicam had no significant effect on motor performance tests that followed middle cerebral artery occlusion. [18] It is known that meloxicam is free from CNS effects [19] and its analgesic effect is largely mediated via peripheral mechanisms. [20] Therefore, the possible explanation of the central effect of meloxicam in this study seems to be not related to the inhibition of Cox-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other isoform, COX‐2, is the inducible form in inflammatory cells 1. COX‐2 inhibitors are leading drugs with reduced side effects, such as reduced incidence of gastrointestinal lesions compared with other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs such as indomethacin 2, 7. In the present study, new COX‐2 inhibitors, celecoxib and meloxicam, induced no serious side effects, but indomethacin induced severe intestinal ulceration and dysfunction of liver (elevated serum GOT and GPT) and kidney (elevated BUN).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%