2014
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2013.2255615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Polarimetric Model-Based Decomposition for Coherency Matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the S matrix, its second-order statistical characteristics coherency matrix T is then further extracted [27,30]:…”
Section: Target Detection Methods Based On Scattering Difference For Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the S matrix, its second-order statistical characteristics coherency matrix T is then further extracted [27,30]:…”
Section: Target Detection Methods Based On Scattering Difference For Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the maximum difference between the elements is only ±1/15 [21]. However, in real OOB landforms, cross-polarization power is found to be more intense than co-polarization power [4][5][6][7]. In this case, we incorporate the refined OOB descriptor C OOB and propose the scattering model of an OOB as follows…”
Section: Oob Scattering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all of this, outputs from the MBDs are sometimes confusing when discrimination between obliquely oriented buildings (OOBs) and natural areas is made. For an OOB whose main scattering center is at an oblique direction with respect to the radar illumination (its orientation angular domain approximately ranges between 22.5 • and 45 • (or between −45 • and −22.5 • ) [4]), intense cross-polarization powers instead of co-polarization powers will be induced [4][5][6][7]. Simultaneously, there also exist significant cross-polarization responses in natural areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is apparent that the quadratic discriminants in (16) are always positive; there are two roots for the quadratic equation. Accordingly, there are three possible solutions: (1) if the larger root is negative, f S (or f D ) is forced to zero; (2) if the larger root is positive and the smaller root is negative, f S (or f D ) is equal to the larger root; and (3) if the smaller root is positive, f S (or f D ) still equals the larger root.…”
Section: Model Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, most of the MBD methods have been developed on the basis of the F3D and Y4D methods. Part of these methods adopted the mathematical operations, i.e., non-negative eigenvalue decomposition (NNED) [12][13][14] and orientation angle compensation (OAC) [15][16][17][18][19], for the input coherency matrix to estimate the scattering contributions in order to pursue an accurate scattering interpretation in a mathematical manner. Despite this, researches are more inclined to introduce sophisticated scattering models to develop and improve the MBD in a physical manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%