1990
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6726.725
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General practitioner obstetrics in Bradford.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obstetric risk factors identified at booking were defined a priori by the study working group using information gathered from seven seminal pieces of empirical work within obstetrics 42–48 . These risk factors included a history of diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, essential hypertension, renal disease, thrombosis, substance abuse and a range of less prevalent disorders (including anorexia, asthma, depression, epilepsy and schizophrenia).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obstetric risk factors identified at booking were defined a priori by the study working group using information gathered from seven seminal pieces of empirical work within obstetrics 42–48 . These risk factors included a history of diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, essential hypertension, renal disease, thrombosis, substance abuse and a range of less prevalent disorders (including anorexia, asthma, depression, epilepsy and schizophrenia).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies were located. One was from the United Kingdom, 36 two were from Canada, 37,38 and three were conducted in the United States 39–41 . These studies included mixed‐risk women and reported referral rates from 12% to 49%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not for the first time, hospital doctors have taken it on themselves to audit general practice activity rather than their own to support their viewpoint. [2][3][4][5][6] The approach also shows a lack of knowledge of the reasons why general practitioners refer patients to dermatologists. Bradlow et al reviewed 3678 referrals from general practitioners to dermatology outpatient clinics and found that 26% of patients were referred for diagnosis or investigation, 14% for advice only, 63% for treatment or management, and 2% for a second opinion or reassurance.7 Thus to analyse general practitioners' referrals solely on the grounds of diagnostic accuracy is to give an incomplete picture of why patients are referred to outpatient clinics.…”
Section: Community Dermatologymentioning
confidence: 99%