2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2008.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Refinement, Part Two: Flexible Refinement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having introduced our notion of vertical BRS refinement and shown the conditions under which it is safe and live with respect to the chosen abstraction functor, we now discuss potential approaches to horizontal refinement and related work. As it happens, both topics take us to the general refinement of Reeves and Streader [23,24].…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Having introduced our notion of vertical BRS refinement and shown the conditions under which it is safe and live with respect to the chosen abstraction functor, we now discuss potential approaches to horizontal refinement and related work. As it happens, both topics take us to the general refinement of Reeves and Streader [23,24].…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What about general vertical refinement, then? The definition of vertical refinement within the general refinement framework [24] relies upon a notion of layers, representing a level of abstraction in terms of (E L , Ξ L , O L ), where E L is a set of entities, Ξ L is a set of contexts and O L is an observation function. Vertical refinement is then defined in terms of a Galois-connection that interprets high-level entities as low-level ones and vice versa.…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our approach will be to use a general parametrised framework, taken from [7,8], where this intimate relation between semantics and refinement is a central idea and explore what effect it can have on a state-based formal method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%