2001
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0705:gpdbcb]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalist Predators Disrupt Biological Control by a Specialist Parasitoid

Abstract: Two broad classes of arthropod natural enemies attack insect herbivores: specialists and generalists. The tight dynamical linkage of specialist natural enemies and their prey may make the specialists able to respond numerically to, and perhaps suppress, herbivore outbreaks. Because generalist predators may attack not only herbivores, but also the herbivores' specialist natural enemies, generalist predators may disrupt control of herbivore populations rather than contribute to it. We examined interactions betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
116
3
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
116
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that this indirect effect is caused by cursorial spiders preying on other predators. Our removal of cursorial spiders (extreme generalist predators) reduced intraguild predation within the system (Rosenheim et al 1993;Snyder and Ives 2001) allowing other generalist predators to maintain control of herbivores, especially grazing herbivores. Since there was no net change in carnivore abundance, this explanation would be valid only if other predators were more efficient at consuming herbivores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that this indirect effect is caused by cursorial spiders preying on other predators. Our removal of cursorial spiders (extreme generalist predators) reduced intraguild predation within the system (Rosenheim et al 1993;Snyder and Ives 2001) allowing other generalist predators to maintain control of herbivores, especially grazing herbivores. Since there was no net change in carnivore abundance, this explanation would be valid only if other predators were more efficient at consuming herbivores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, predatory encounters between the latter and parasitoid hymenopterans also represent intraguild interference, and hymenopteran parasitoids or their parasitised hosts, respectively, can be preyed upon by carabid beetles and spiders (e.g. Heimpel et al 1997;Brodeur and Rosenheim 2000;Snyder and Ives 2001). Potentially, natural enemies can interfere negatively with the impact of aphid parasitoids (e.g.…”
Section: Intraguild Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraguild interference is a feature typical for polyphagous predator communities, and also a widespread phenomenon among generalist invertebrate predators occurring in arable land (e.g. Schaefer 1974;Rosenheim et al 1995;Guillebeau and All 1989;Kester and Jackson 1996;Dinter 1998;Sunderland et al 1997;Snyder and Ives 2001). In consequence, intraguild interference can be antagonistic to pest control and may even lead to an enhancement of the concerned prey population, if the main predator of this prey is substantially reduced by another predator (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is apparently no absolute lower limit to host size in that eggs deposited in aphid embryos develop successfully although the eclosing wasps are much smaller than counterparts developing in larger aphids (Mackauer and Kambhampati 1988). Hyperparasitism (Sullivan and Völkl 1999) and predation (Colfer and Rosenheim 2001;Snyder and Ives 2001) could also cause sexspecific offspring mortality. For example, Dendrocerus carpenteri (Curtis) (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae), a generalist hyperparasitoid of aphidiine prepupae and pupae inside mummified aphids, chooses hosts according to mummy size (Mackauer and Lardner 1995;Otto and Mackauer 1998).…”
Section: Sampling Of Parasitoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%