1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00099-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizability of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry population: Factors relevant to epidemiologic and health care research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
100
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to SEER, inclusion of specific registries was based on their generalizable population demographics and ability to maintain high standards in cancer reporting. Age and sex characteristics of the SEER population are comparable to that of the United States; however, SEER data may account for a more urban and affluent population in comparison to the United States as a whole [20,24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to SEER, inclusion of specific registries was based on their generalizable population demographics and ability to maintain high standards in cancer reporting. Age and sex characteristics of the SEER population are comparable to that of the United States; however, SEER data may account for a more urban and affluent population in comparison to the United States as a whole [20,24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing the SEER data with the overall US population, it is apparent that those residing within the SEER areas are more affluent, have lower unemployment, and are substantially more urban than the rest of the US population. 49 These problems of generalizability can affect the validity of the confidence intervals presented here.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…No SEER county with a substantial AA population (at least 5%) was classified as rural by the 1990 Census. 40 Thus, SEER breast cancer data for AA women reflect the incidence and survival patterns for a highly urban AA female population. In addition, this population likely has higher socioeconomic status compared with the AA female population at large, because 20 SEER counties with substantial numbers of AA residents had significantly higher levels of education and income compared with non-SEER counties that had similar numbers of AA residents.…”
Section: Representativeness Of Aa Populations Covered By Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this population likely has higher socioeconomic status compared with the AA female population at large, because 20 SEER counties with substantial numbers of AA residents had significantly higher levels of education and income compared with non-SEER counties that had similar numbers of AA residents. 40 Because higher regional socioeconomic status has been associated previously with elevated breast cancer rates in AA populations, 5,19 breast cancer patterns gleaned from SEER data may overestimate incidence for the AA female population at large. This possibility has been raised previously with the observation that breast cancer rates in predominantly black, rural counties in North Carolina and Georgia are substantially lower compared with the overall SEER rate.…”
Section: Representativeness Of Aa Populations Covered By Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%