2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-020-04521-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Effects of Naturalistic Social Communication Intervention for Minimally Verbal Children with Autism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the ultra-light clay intervention involving subject-to-subject interaction had a generalization effect on initiating communication but not on responsive communication. We speculate that the language initiated by children with ASD may include errors in pronunciation, grammar, and semantic expression ( Hampton et al, 2020 ), making it difficult for peers to understand and respond. Future researchers can exploit some intervention methods to help children with ASD express language more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the ultra-light clay intervention involving subject-to-subject interaction had a generalization effect on initiating communication but not on responsive communication. We speculate that the language initiated by children with ASD may include errors in pronunciation, grammar, and semantic expression ( Hampton et al, 2020 ), making it difficult for peers to understand and respond. Future researchers can exploit some intervention methods to help children with ASD express language more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Ben-Itzchak and Zachor (2007) observed that behavioral reinforcement improved the verbal response of children with ASD (e.g., responding to joy or anger), though it did not improve children’s ability to initiate communication (e.g., expressing joy or anger proactively). Similarly, Hampton et al (2020) also revealed that behavioral reinforcement (e.g., prompt reinforcement or “ask-answer” reinforcement) promoted language imitation and response in children with ASD but did not improve children’s initiation in the changed context. This is not surprising given that initiating is considered a pivotal behavior and an essential skill in social communication ( Koegel and Koegel, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The only variable with consistent positive outcomes was the use of spontaneous (non-imitative) gestures when gesture imitation was taught via PBET intervention; this may actually represent a lack of discrimination (i.e., child gestures with or without cues to imitate) rather than an appropriately generalized outcome. Corollary outcomes were most often measured in PBET interventions; the lack of positive corollary outcomes is interesting given that naturalistic interventions with similar components (e.g., JASPER; Hampton et al, 2020) have been shown to improve play and communication outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%