Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory
DOI: 10.1109/isit.1997.613295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Hamming weights of q-ary Reed-Muller codes

Abstract: The order bound on generalized Hamming weights is introduced in a general setting of codes on varieties which comprises both the one point geometric Goppa codes as the q-ary Reed-Muller codes. For the latter codes it is shown that this bound is sharp and that they satisfy the double chain condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…What is stated above are, in fact, special cases of the results of Heijnen and Pellikaan [10], which deals, more generally, with the case r ≤ m+d d…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is stated above are, in fact, special cases of the results of Heijnen and Pellikaan [10], which deals, more generally, with the case r ≤ m+d d…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The theorem of Heijnen-Pellikaan is intimately related to the determination of higher weights (also known as, generalized Hamming weights) of Reed-Muller codes RM q (d, m) and in fact, that was the original motivation of [10]. In a similar manner, the TBC is closely related to determination of higher weights of projective ReedMuller codes PRM q (d, m).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the following section a sketch will be given how this gives rise to a sequence of codes C(l) and a bound on the minimum distance of these codes following the ideas of [5,6,7,11,12,13,19,20,22,23]. This was generalized to a bound on the generalized Hamming weights by [10].…”
Section: The Index Of Speciality I(g) Of a Divisor G Is A Nonnegativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, X m ] to F n , since f g(P i ) = f (P i )g(P i ) for all polynomials f and g, and all i. The map ev P is surjective [3,10]. Suppose that I is an ideal in the ring F[X 1 , .…”
Section: A Bound On the Minimum Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation