2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized linear models with clustered data: Fixed and random effects models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the cluster size increases, however, AGQ takes over and becomes most reliable in terms of bias and precision. Since the Laplace approximation is known to be precise only for normally distributed data or for non-normal data in large clusters [30], we observed an expected poor performance of this approximation in our settings [23]. PQL also exhibits an inferior performance for low icc's and a low outcome prevalence, while additionally revealing disconcerting performance issues for a withincluster measured predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the cluster size increases, however, AGQ takes over and becomes most reliable in terms of bias and precision. Since the Laplace approximation is known to be precise only for normally distributed data or for non-normal data in large clusters [30], we observed an expected poor performance of this approximation in our settings [23]. PQL also exhibits an inferior performance for low icc's and a low outcome prevalence, while additionally revealing disconcerting performance issues for a withincluster measured predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Focusing on the two aforementioned frameworks, current literature on the analysis of clustered binary outcomes reveals two major limitations: clusters of size two were either not considered [17][18][19][20], or they were, but limited to only one of both frameworks [21][22][23][24]. Here, we compare several estimation procedures within both GLMM-and SEM-frameworks for modeling this type of data, by considering the performance of relevant R-packages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Wald test was used to assess the significance. Statistical analyses were performed with R v. 2.15.1 [56] using the packages BiodiversityR [57], ape [58], lme4 [59] and glmmML [60].…”
Section: (D) Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computations were completed using the 'glmmML' package (Broström and Holmberg, 2012) in the statistical software R, version 2.14.1 (R Development Core Team, 2012).…”
Section: Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%