2019
DOI: 10.1101/780767
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Multi-SNP Mediation Intersection-Union Test

Abstract: To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying genetic variants identified from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for a variety of phenotypic traits encompassing binary, continuous, count, and survival outcomes, we propose a novel and flexible method to test for mediation that can simultaneously accommodate multiple genetic variants and different types of outcome variables. Specifically, we employ the intersection-union test approach combined with likelihood ratio test to detect mediation effect of mult… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure the desirable type I error control of IUT, we exploit P max = max( P α , P β ) to evaluate the overall significance of the mediation effect. IUT is advantageous in that the resulting mediation effect test has conceptual simplicity and feasibility of maneuver, and P max per se can be employed as the P- value for assessing the significance of mediation [ 51 , 52 , 55 , 122 ]. Obviously, when rejecting H 0 if P max is less than the given significance level of α , IUT is indeed a level- α test, representing that the type I error of IUT is guaranteed at most α once the rejection decision for H 0 is made [ 47 , 49 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To ensure the desirable type I error control of IUT, we exploit P max = max( P α , P β ) to evaluate the overall significance of the mediation effect. IUT is advantageous in that the resulting mediation effect test has conceptual simplicity and feasibility of maneuver, and P max per se can be employed as the P- value for assessing the significance of mediation [ 51 , 52 , 55 , 122 ]. Obviously, when rejecting H 0 if P max is less than the given significance level of α , IUT is indeed a level- α test, representing that the type I error of IUT is guaranteed at most α once the rejection decision for H 0 is made [ 47 , 49 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is conceptually straightforward, this naïve IUT-based approach is oftentimes extremely conservative especially in large scale mediation effect tests due to its composite null nature [ 43 , 53 ], which can be equivalently expressed as a combination of three disjoint component null hypotheses. To correct the intrinsic conservativeness of IUT, we estimated the proportion for each component null hypothesis and constructed a novel null distribution for P max by fitting a three-component mixture null distribution [ 54 ], which, in contrast to the naïve uniform null distribution of P max assumed in previous literature [ 51 , 52 , 55 ], can lead to a desirable control of family-wise error rate (FWER) or false discovery rate (FDR). We thus refer to our proposed approach framework as the intersection-union survival mixture-adjusted mediation test (IUSMMT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a generalized multi-SNP mediation intersection-union test to rigorously assess the effects of multiple eSNPs on ascension through their alteration of eGene expression (31). The locations and FDR of significant mediator eGenes were visualized using Circos software (32).…”
Section: Mediation Test For Cis-eqtl On Ascending Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the generalized multi-SNP mediation intersection-union test (31) to the identified cis-eQTLs with FDR < 0.1, and determined that expression of 33 eGenes was increased in women with endometrial infection (FDR < 0.2, Table 3), and expression of 48 eGenes was decreased in women with endometrial infection (FDR < 0.2, Table 4). Distribution and size of these 81 eGenes, their positions within the chromosomes and -log 10(FDR) of mediation tests were demonstrated by circos plot (Figure 1).…”
Section: Genes Mediating Cis Effects On Ascending Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%