2011
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2010.2071415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Reconstruction-Based Contributions for Output-Relevant Fault Diagnosis With Application to the Tennessee Eastman Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the process sample is identified as a faulty sample, i.e. ( | ) ≥ C , it can be divided into two parts [8] : = * + f , the fault free vector is * , while the fault is f = f • f .Here f is the fault magnitude and Following the concept of fault isolation through reconstruction [24][25][26] (or similarly missing variables approach [12] ), the reconstruction-based multivariate contribution (RBMVC) corresponding to a given variable…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the process sample is identified as a faulty sample, i.e. ( | ) ≥ C , it can be divided into two parts [8] : = * + f , the fault free vector is * , while the fault is f = f • f .Here f is the fault magnitude and Following the concept of fault isolation through reconstruction [24][25][26] (or similarly missing variables approach [12] ), the reconstruction-based multivariate contribution (RBMVC) corresponding to a given variable…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B is non-condensable and must exit from the purge stream 9, increasing the purge rate x 10 . For fault 4, step change in reactor cooling water inlet temperature directly leads to abnormal variation of reactor temperature x 9 and reactor cooling water outlet temperature x 21 . It is clear that fault 6 (A feed loss) has significant influence on the flow rate of component A in stream 1 (x 1 ).…”
Section: The Tennessee Eastman Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This basic contribution analysis has been improved in various studies to consider multiple process variables simultaneously [18]. Reconstruction based contribution was proposed specifically for PCA to re-calculate the variables and monitoring statistics along "faulty directions" [19,20,21]. The variables or directions are considered faulty if the reconstructed monitoring statistics are less than control limits, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations