2018
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Procrustes analysis of an ontogenetic series of modified crania: Evaluating the technique of modification in the Migration Period of Europe (4th–7th century AD)

Abstract: Hungarian crania were modified with two bindings with limited shape variation, whereas the Georgian crania had greater variation in shape being also modified with antero-posterior bindings. The findings from this study alongside contemporary historical sources help to understand the role of intentional cranial modification as a mark of social identity among nomads in the Migration Period of Europe.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although combinations of these metric traits allow for the identification of major ACM forms to a certain extent (e.g., Falkenburger, ; O'Brien & Stanley, ), the limited number of recordable variables on the cranial vault prevents clear discrimination among certain types and is inadequate for accurately describing fine shape changes between individuals. More recently, geometric morphometrics has been used to quantify ACM diversity among modern humans (Cheverud, Kohn, Konigsberg, & Leigh, ; Friess & Baylac, ; Gómez‐Valdés, Bautista Martínez, & Romano Pacheco, ; Kohn, Leigh, & Cheverud, ; Kuzminsky, Tung, Hubbe, & Villaseñor‐Marchal, ; Manríquez, González‐Bergás, Salinas, & Espoueys, ; Mayall et al, ; Mayall & Pilbrow, ; Perez, ; Perez et al, ). Those studies have measured the shape changes among different ACM variants and highlighted how effective geometric morphometrics can be when applied to the issue of discriminating among various ACM techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although combinations of these metric traits allow for the identification of major ACM forms to a certain extent (e.g., Falkenburger, ; O'Brien & Stanley, ), the limited number of recordable variables on the cranial vault prevents clear discrimination among certain types and is inadequate for accurately describing fine shape changes between individuals. More recently, geometric morphometrics has been used to quantify ACM diversity among modern humans (Cheverud, Kohn, Konigsberg, & Leigh, ; Friess & Baylac, ; Gómez‐Valdés, Bautista Martínez, & Romano Pacheco, ; Kohn, Leigh, & Cheverud, ; Kuzminsky, Tung, Hubbe, & Villaseñor‐Marchal, ; Manríquez, González‐Bergás, Salinas, & Espoueys, ; Mayall et al, ; Mayall & Pilbrow, ; Perez, ; Perez et al, ). Those studies have measured the shape changes among different ACM variants and highlighted how effective geometric morphometrics can be when applied to the issue of discriminating among various ACM techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%