2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00937-3_57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizing Deep Models for Ultrasound Image Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even when using the same MRI sequence, the data distribution can vary in datasets acquired at different centers [5], [29] or different time [4]. Besides MRI images, domain adaptation studies have been performed on cross-site ultrasound datasets [34], [39], X-ray images [35], [43], histopathology applications [40], and optical fundus imaging [17]. Compared to above scenarios, cross-modality adaptation is perhaps the most challenging situation due to the significant domain shift caused by the different physical principles of modalities [7], [36], [37], [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when using the same MRI sequence, the data distribution can vary in datasets acquired at different centers [5], [29] or different time [4]. Besides MRI images, domain adaptation studies have been performed on cross-site ultrasound datasets [34], [39], X-ray images [35], [43], histopathology applications [40], and optical fundus imaging [17]. Compared to above scenarios, cross-modality adaptation is perhaps the most challenging situation due to the significant domain shift caused by the different physical principles of modalities [7], [36], [37], [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shows an example image for each analyzed dataset; in the context of generalization among different datasets, Yan et al [57] evaluated the average vessel segmentation performance on three retinal fundus image datasets under the three-dataset training condition, while pair-wisely assessing the cross-dataset performance on two datasets under the other one-dataset training condition.Yang et al[58] proposed an alternative approach using adversarial appearance rendering to relieve the burden of re-training for Ultrasound imaging datasets. Differently, we thoroughly evaluate all possible training/testing conditions (for a total of 21 configurations) on each dataset to confirm the intra-and cross-dataset generalization ability by incrementally injecting samples from the other datasets at hand.With regard to the 4-fold cross-validation, we partitioned the datasets #1, #2, and #3 into 4 folds by using the following patient indices:{[1, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversifying the training data by creating larger datasets is a possible solution, but recent medical imaging studies [21,23,24] have shown that it does not guarantee improved generalization. DA methods try to minimize the dataset variation, while retaining the distinguishing aspects for task classifier, and have been shown to generalize well in image segmentation tasks for multiple modalities [25][26][27].…”
Section: Challenge Of Dataset Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%